tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19798349.post1749849871358568073..comments2024-03-22T12:20:48.920+00:00Comments on open...: Petard, Meet Australian GovernmentGlyn Moodyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04436885795882611585noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19798349.post-69369468281844765732006-11-26T17:32:00.000+00:002006-11-26T17:32:00.000+00:00Better still, they could make their Internet addre...Better still, they could make their Internet address purely nominal, and put it in a big directory - maybe one with yellow pages - where it referred to the physical address you would send you written request. After that, you'd get a letter back telling you another (changing) physical address where you could go to view the Web page (once) - it would be too dangerous actually to allow users to access your site.Glyn Moodyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04436885795882611585noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19798349.post-36440551676510782472006-11-26T16:33:00.000+00:002006-11-26T16:33:00.000+00:00Oh, boy. This is especially annoying when there i...Oh, boy. This is especially annoying when there is already robots.txt that people can use if they don't want Google or others to index their content.<br /><br />If they want to make a law that penalizes crawlers for ignoring robots.txt, that would be slightly more reasonable.<br /><br />Of course, to be fair for copyright owners, shouldn't *everyone* be required to get permission before accessing a web page? If there are web sites out there concerned about copies being made, they really should require permission be granted in all cases, shouldn't they? Crawlers and browsers alike. My computer and browser can make copies that I then may keep saved and distribute to others.<br /><br />To be sure it's all official, I suggest these web sites who are concerned about being found or read should put up a front page that gives a postal address for you to write and request permission to access. Then they would reply by post with a secret URL for one-time only access.<br /><br />That would work much better.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com