tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19798349.post5084321292727957771..comments2024-03-22T12:20:48.920+00:00Comments on open...: Which Licence for Open Source Digital Voting?Glyn Moodyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04436885795882611585noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19798349.post-90021951369695747692010-03-01T15:18:15.681+00:002010-03-01T15:18:15.681+00:00Interesting... in a head-achey sort of way, when o...Interesting... in a head-achey sort of way, when one doesn't understand all that needs consideration. :)Peterhttp://gnuosphere.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19798349.post-11379187912956817792010-03-01T15:06:35.277+00:002010-03-01T15:06:35.277+00:00@Peter: yes, the issues are interesting, aren'...@Peter: yes, the issues are interesting, aren't they?Glyn Moodyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04436885795882611585noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19798349.post-40164695160292137442010-03-01T15:02:55.609+00:002010-03-01T15:02:55.609+00:00Wow...this is a more complex issue than I had thou...Wow...this is a more complex issue than I had thought. Such details are beyond my understanding at this point.<br /><br /><a href="http://gnuosphere.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/ethical-licensing-for-electronic-voting-software/" rel="nofollow">A while back</a>, I thought the AGPL would be the best choice though I'm probably incorrect.<br /><br />Regardless, the software itself must at least be semi-free software if it is proprietary. It is not acceptable if the software is not auditable by the general public. In fact, obfuscated code doesn't just fall short of the mark... it is a dangerous affront to democracy.Peterhttp://gnuosphere.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.com