tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19798349.post8011029276638899146..comments2024-03-22T12:20:48.920+00:00Comments on open...: How Microsoft Uses Open Against OpenGlyn Moodyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04436885795882611585noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19798349.post-63566043108601633102008-05-12T07:00:00.000+00:002008-05-12T07:00:00.000+00:00Thanks for the link with its very full summary of ...Thanks for the link with its very full summary of just what's wrong with OOXML. I've written about this extensively, but it's good to see others getting the message out.Glyn Moodyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04436885795882611585noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19798349.post-73901485367661329372008-05-12T02:24:00.000+00:002008-05-12T02:24:00.000+00:00I agree with your points, not only in this presen...I agree with your points, not only in this present article, but more importantly with regards to ODF versus OOXML. I have collected some facts and links about this on my blog:<BR/>http://www.simbiosys.ca/blog/2008/05/11/what-is-wrong-with-ooxml/<BR/><BR/>It is sad that Peter is not willing to advocate ODF, because it isn't used by enough Chemists in his opinion. Interestingly, he himself pointed out the flaw in this very same logic about the use of CML few days earlier on his blog:<BR/>(<A><BR/>href="http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/blogs/murrayrust/?p=1081">http://wwmm.ch.cam.a<BR/>c.uk/blogs/murrayrust/?p=1081</A>)<BR/><BR/><I><BR/>AJW: It would be good to see CML be a standard. I’ve been following it for a<BR/>decade and when it gets accepted by a larger majority then we might adopt it.<BR/><BR/>PMR: Chicken and egg… :-) You won’t adopt it until other people adopt it and<BR/>they won’t adopt it till you do.<BR/></I><BR/><BR/>He is a great advocate of open access, so it would be excellent if he would also join us to advocate ODF. Well, one can always hope... :-)<BR/><BR/>ZZ.ZZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14856266422002159753noreply@blogger.com