Whenever I meet with VCs I've noticed that there is a growing distaste for Web 2.0 startups. The "Web 2.0" term, in connection with a startup, and as a collection of concepts, is very tired in this community.
I think this is good news. Although I've used "Web 2.0" as a shorthand for a group of sites/services/technologies, what is much more important are the driving forces behind them. And those, quite simply, are openness, sharing and the Net-based, distributed methodology pioneered by open source. The more we concentrate on those core currents underneath, and the less on the trendy froth on top, the better.
I didn't used to think it mattered what you call it web 2.0 or openness.
ReplyDeleteHowever with the growing number of corporations and established media giants hijacking web2.0 to perpetuate their control. I think 'open' is a term that better defines what is happening since no corporation by it's very nature can be open.
Unfortunately, that doesn't stop them trying to hijack the term...
ReplyDeleteDead already ?
ReplyDeleteDamn I never even got to start a web 2.0 site !
At least you can be open now....
ReplyDelete