05 November 2007

Web 2.0 is Dead, Long Live Openness

An interesting post from Tom Foremski, who, even if he doesn't always grok the underlying dynamics of open source and its offshoots, is certainly plugged into the right people in Silicon Valley, and is very sharp about spotting trends there:

Whenever I meet with VCs I've noticed that there is a growing distaste for Web 2.0 startups. The "Web 2.0" term, in connection with a startup, and as a collection of concepts, is very tired in this community.

I think this is good news. Although I've used "Web 2.0" as a shorthand for a group of sites/services/technologies, what is much more important are the driving forces behind them. And those, quite simply, are openness, sharing and the Net-based, distributed methodology pioneered by open source. The more we concentrate on those core currents underneath, and the less on the trendy froth on top, the better.

4 comments:

  1. Anonymous3:49 pm

    I didn't used to think it mattered what you call it web 2.0 or openness.
    However with the growing number of corporations and established media giants hijacking web2.0 to perpetuate their control. I think 'open' is a term that better defines what is happening since no corporation by it's very nature can be open.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Unfortunately, that doesn't stop them trying to hijack the term...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dead already ?

    Damn I never even got to start a web 2.0 site !

    ReplyDelete
  4. At least you can be open now....

    ReplyDelete