ISO keeps whining about "personal attacks", when the facts clearly work against their defense of their handling of DIS-29500. Good work - just keep responding with the facts. That's all we need to do.
I work to the ISO-17025 standard in my business, and I consider it a good and well-developed standard. But after witnessing the DIS-29500 fiasco, I'll never see ISO-17025 (or any other ISO standard) in the same light again. I guess standards-setting is something like sausage -- if it matters to you, best not to watch it being made.
Superb article.
ReplyDeleteISO keeps whining about "personal attacks", when the facts clearly work against their defense of their handling of DIS-29500. Good work - just keep responding with the facts. That's all we need to do.
I work to the ISO-17025 standard in my business, and I consider it a good and well-developed standard. But after witnessing the DIS-29500 fiasco, I'll never see ISO-17025 (or any other ISO standard) in the same light again. I guess standards-setting is something like sausage -- if it matters to you, best not to watch it being made.
Thanks. Sorry about the delay in posting - Gmail is eating blogger comments....
ReplyDelete