The EU Commission is “committed to improve the international legal framework for IP protection” and sees “ACTA as one way to reach that goal,” Devigne said. There was no intention to duplicate TRIPS. Rather, “we want to go beyond it,” he said, adding, “TRIPS is the floor, not the ceiling.”
Well, that's pretty clear: they are aiming to produce something even worse than TRIPS. This, though, is less convincing:
“It is not that we want to hide something, we just don’t have something to show.” Devigne also rejected all claims about a possibly secrecy in the negotiations. “Quite on the contrary, for international trade negotiations we normally do not have such a democracy exercise where everybody can raise their concern,” said Devigne. For this kind of negotiations the Commission would normally only consult with member states.
One other nugget is the following:
so far there is only consensus in any case to exempt patents from criminal law sanctions.
Drip, drip, drip....
No comments:
Post a Comment