Lord Carlile said the long-term aim was to introduce intercept evidence, but the circumstances were not yet right.
"Before intercept evidence can be useful in court it has to be able to satisfy two broad tests," he said. "It has to be legally viable and it has to be practically viable.
"I suspect that [the government] may well say that neither of those broad tests have been met."
He said that under European human rights law all material intercepted during the course of an inquiry would have to be available at trial, possibly several years later.
The practical means to electronically store that much data did not currently exist, he said.
Obviously the government's intercept data is special heavy *pixie* data that can't be stored on ordinary technology in the same way that the terabytes of *ordinary* ISP data can...
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca.
No comments:
Post a Comment