open...
open source, open genomics, open creation
Showing posts with label
algorithms
.
Show all posts
Showing posts with label
algorithms
.
Show all posts
03 May 2011
Do the Maths
›
Long-time readers of this blog will know that I like to point out that software patents shouldn't be allowed because (among other reason...
25 April 2011
Do Creatorless Creations Deserve Copyright?
›
Copyright has its convenient myths. The principal one is that copyright is intellectual *property*, which taps into our natural tendency to...
08 July 2010
Free Software Coder Bullied over *Algorithm*
›
As long-suffering readers of this blog will know, one of the many reasons I am against software patents is that software consists of algorit...
7 comments:
23 December 2009
All Hail the Mighty Algorithm
›
As long-suffering readers of this blog will know, one of the reasons I regard software patents as dangerous is because software consists of ...
04 June 2009
Knuth: Every Algorithm is Sacred
›
One of my computer heroes, Donald Knuth, has sent a message to the head of the EPO, hoping to convince her that every algorithm is sacred, ...
06 May 2009
EPO: FSFE Does It by the Numbers
›
Yesterday I was praising Red Hat's submission to the EPO in its pondering of the patentability of software. Today, it's the FSFE...
23 March 2009
Have I Got News for *Them*
›
This is just incredible : Major media companies are increasingly lobbying Google to elevate their expensive professional content within the ...
6 comments:
15 November 2008
Of Lawyers and Software Patents
›
Regular readers will know that I have a bee in my bonnet about the non-patentability of software, largely because of the fact that software ...
10 comments:
13 October 2008
Symbian's Patently Terrible “Triumph”
›
Although I've written elsewhere about the recent court case of Symbian v Comptroller General of Patents, noting that it was bad news, I ...
2 comments:
08 October 2008
Bad News on the UK Software Patent Front
›
Why is there always this Jesuitical casuistry when it comes to software? We have the following: what goes on inside a computer can be said...
19 March 2008
Court Backslides on UK Software Patents
›
On Open Enterprise blog .
12 November 2007
Patently Outrageous
›
Europe does not allow software patents, but that doesn't stop some people - patent lawyers, mostly - from circumventing that clear and s...
18 October 2007
Of Open Source, Open Access and Donald Knuth
›
I often witter on about open access , assuming people know what I'm talking about. But if you'd like a little historical background...
24 September 2007
What Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi Knew
›
Nice to see algorithms getting some respect : Algorithms, as closely guarded as state secrets, buy and sell stocks and mortgage-backed secur...
18 July 2007
Seeing the Power of the Visual Commons
›
I've written before about Microsoft's Photosynth, which draws on the Net's visual commons - Flickr, typically - to create three...
07 June 2007
Microsoft, Its Rose and the Canker
›
Now here's an interesting thing : Developing the Future is an annual report examining the impact of the software development industry on...
01 March 2007
Undermining Digg
›
Digg occupies such an emblematic place in the Web 2.0 world that it's important to understand what's really going on with this incre...
19 April 2006
The Euston Manifesto
›
After the right espousing open source and related open goodness yesterday, today we have the left. More specifically, we have something ca...
2 comments:
09 April 2006
(Patently) Right
›
Paul Graham is a master stylist - indeed, one of the best writers on technology around. Reading his latest essay, " Are Software Paten...
›
Home
View web version