open...
open source, open genomics, open creation
Showing posts with label
ooxml
.
Show all posts
Showing posts with label
ooxml
.
Show all posts
02 October 2008
Norwegians Get the Blues
›
A little while back I noted a provocative call from IBM for standards bodies to do better – a clear reference to the ISO's handling of O...
26 September 2008
A Victory (of Sorts) for e-Petitions
›
It's easy to be cynical about 10 Downing Street's e-petitions (I should know). But here's a case where it might even have done...
1 comment:
02 September 2008
The Beginning of the End for the ISO?
›
Yesterday I was urging people to submit comments on the EU's interoperability framework. I mentioned that one of the important issues in...
01 September 2008
Write to Them: European Interoperability Framework v2
›
I've noted before that writing to MPs/MEPs seems to be remarkably effective in terms of generating a response. The naïve among us might ...
15 August 2008
ISO's Day of Shame
›
So ISO has decided it wants to be irrelevant : The two ISO and IEC technical boards have given the go-ahead to publish ISO/IEC DIS 29500, In...
14 comments:
02 July 2008
Defending Openness in the European Union
›
In Open Enterprise blog .
23 June 2008
No, Really: Spare a Fiver?
›
On Open Enterprise blog .
12 June 2008
The Subtle Art of Open Source Migrations
›
On Open Enterprise blog .
10 June 2008
I Came, ISO, I Didn't Conquer
›
The OOXML farce continues : Four national standards body members of ISO and IEC – Brazil, India, South Africa and Venezuela – have submitted...
23 May 2008
ISO Appeal: South Africa Rises to the Challenge
›
On Open Enterprise blog .
15 May 2008
A Blog Rant from Absurdistan
›
One of the great things about the blogosphere is the scope it provides for the unfettered rant – a piece where the author is totally and utt...
8 comments:
14 May 2008
Becta and Becta
›
On Open Enterprise blog .
12 May 2008
Is Microsoft Poisoning its Sea of Troubles?
›
On Open Enterprise blog .
11 May 2008
A Word in Your Ear
›
A little while back I gave Peter Murray-Rust a hard time for daring to suggest that OOXML might be acceptable for archiving purposes. Here&...
6 comments:
05 May 2008
When is a Standard Not a Standard?
›
On Open Enterprise blog .
03 May 2008
OOXML? For Pete's Sake, No
›
Peter Murray-Rust is one of the key figures in the world of open data and open science, and deserves a lot of the credit for making these is...
5 comments:
02 May 2008
Has OOXML Broken the British Standards Institution?
›
On Open Enterprise blog .
01 May 2008
Multiple Implementations vs. Multiple Standards
›
I've written many times about the distinction between multiple competing impementations of a standard, which promote competition because...
28 April 2008
Should We Boycott Microsoft? Can We?
›
On Linux Journal .
19 April 2008
Cold Facts About the Norwegian OOXML Scandal
›
The meeting was a farce and the result was a scandal. But it’s not over yet, and one thing is clear: the “little one” is unfit to represent ...
‹
›
Home
View web version