open...
open source, open genomics, open creation
Showing posts with label
tim o'reilly
.
Show all posts
Showing posts with label
tim o'reilly
.
Show all posts
03 March 2009
CollabNet Comes Out of the Shadows
›
CollabNet has a fascinating history that goes back to 1999, when Collab.Net launched SourceXchange: a site where companies can post proposal...
27 January 2009
Wanted: the First GNU/Linux Distro for the Cloud
›
As this amazing chart shows, there are basically three great families of GNU/Linux distros: those based on Red Hat, Slackware and Debian. Th...
06 January 2009
The Once and Future Economy
›
Great post by Tim O'Reilly about how we need to junk the idea that the economy can expand indefinitely, and move to a different system ...
05 January 2009
Computational Journalism
›
I like the sound of this : the digital revolution that has been undermining in-depth reportage may be ready to give something back, through ...
29 October 2008
Tim O'Reilly's Greatest Post
›
I don't always agree with Tim O'Reilly's views, but it seems clear to me that this is his best, and potentially most important p...
4 comments:
31 July 2008
An Unclouded Analysis
›
I'm not a huge fan of Tim O'Reilly's position on free software, which seems to be that code exists primarily as a business oppo...
20 October 2007
DNA Vu
›
Now, where have I heard this before? Today it costs only $300,000 to sequence a person's DNA, and the $100,000 benchmark is in sight. I...
15 August 2007
O'Reilly? I Think Not
›
Once again, Matt gets it, and Tim doesn't: "I will predict that virtually every open source company (including Red Hat) will e...
2 comments:
25 July 2007
When Eben Met Tim
›
I've always felt rather ambivalent about Tim O'Reilly. On the one hand, he is undoubtedly a very shrewd reader of markets, and has ...
20 June 2007
Do Not Feed the Patent Trolls
›
Good point here about a big problem with the apparently welcome Peer to Patent project: Helping patent trolls with their QA is like going ...
08 March 2007
The Tim O'Reilly of Open Access
›
I thought I knew open access history pretty well, but to my shame I seem to overlooked Melissa Hagemann : Hagemann's strategic, behind-...
›
Home
View web version