skip to main |
skip to sidebar
As I mentioned
back in October, the Joint Parliamentary Committee that has been
considering the Draft Communications Data Bill, aka Snooper's Charter,
seemed to be doing a rather splendid job. It asked witnesses extremely
perceptive questions, and seemed unwilling simply to accept the UK
government's line that we needed these draconian powers because
"terrorism"...
On
Open Enterprise blog.
The rapid uptake of ebooks by the public shows that there is a
widespread recognition of their advantages. This would be good news for
the publishing industry as it faces the transition from analog to
digital formats, were it not for the fact that some publishers keep
finding new ways of making ebooks less attractive than physical versions.
On
Techdirt.
There is a natural tendency to accentuate the negative when it comes
to drones -- concentrating on how these "spies the sky" represent a
threat to privacy and civil liberties. But as Techdirt has reported before, there are other applications that many might find not just acceptable but welcome. And that's not surprising: like the Internet, drones are just a neutral tool, and as such can be deployed for both good and bad purposes.
On
Techdirt.
Whether or not you believe that CCTV surveillance makes the world a
safer place, there's a big problem with deploying it more widely: you
still need someone to look at that footage and pick out the things of
interest, and it's much harder adding new personnel than adding new
cameras.
On Techdirt.
As Techdirt stories regularly report, governments around the world,
including those in the West, are greatly increasing their surveillance
of the Internet. Alongside a loss of the private sphere, this also
represents a clear danger to basic civil liberties. The good news is
that we already have the solution: encrypting communications makes it
very hard, if not entirely impossible, for others to eavesdrop on our
conversations. The bad news is that crypto is largely ignored by the
general public, partly because they don't know about it, and partly
because even if they do, it seems too much trouble to implement.
On
Techdirt.
Back in August, I urged
people to respond to the consultation on the truly dreadful Draft
Communications Bill, aka Snooper's Charter. Obviously, I wasn't alone
in doing that: many organisations concerned about the impact on civil
liberties in this country have done the same. For example, both 38
Degrees and Open Rights Group (ORG) provided suggested texts and asked
people to contact the Joint Parliamentary Committee that has been
considering the Bill - and doing rather a good job of it, I must say.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
Transparency is worth having for itself, since governments often tend
to behave a little better when they know that someone is watching. But
occasionally, requests for data turn up something big and totally
unexpected because someone failed to notice quite what the information
provided implies.
On
Techdirt.
It's become something of a cliché that anyone with a mobile phone is
carrying a tracking device that provides detailed information about
their location. But things are moving on, as researchers (and probably
others as well) explore new ways to subvert increasingly-common
smartphones to gain other revealing data about their users. Here's a
rather clever use of malware to turn your smartphone into a system for taking clandestine photos -- something we've seen before, of course, in other contexts -- but which then goes even further by stitching them together to form a pretty accurate 3D model of your world:
On
Techdirt.
Any EU project called "Clean IT",
with all that implies for elements that are regarded as "dirty", is
worrying enough. But combined with a stated intention of "reducing the
impact of the terrorist use of the Internet", the concerns naturally
grow. After all, it is precisely by invoking the vague and emotional
threat of "terrorism" that the UK government has sought to short-circuit
criticism of many of its most illiberal policies, most recently with
the ill thought-out Draft Communications Bill.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
Just when you think the Megaupload farce can't get any more ridiculous, it does. Following revelations
that New Zealand's Government Communications Security Bureau illegally
intercepted communications in the Megaupload case and provided those
details to law enforcement authorities, the country's Prime Minister has
been forced to apologize personally to Kim Dotcom:
"Of course I apologize to Mr Dotcom, and I apologize to New
Zealanders." From his position of increasing strength as more and more
missteps by the New Zealand authorities come to light, Dotcom graciously accepted those apologies.
On
Techdirt.
Large-scale surveillance of private communications is becoming depressingly routine, even in supposedly enlightened democracies. In less freedom-loving locations, Internet cafes are viewed with particular suspicion, and subject to tight controls. But it looks like Cambodia is taking surveillance of Internet cafes in particular, and communications in general, to new heights/depths:
On
Techdirt.
Back in February we wrote
about the ominously-named "Clean IT" project in Europe, designed to
combat the use of the Internet by terrorists. At that time, we
suspected that this would produce some seriously bad ideas, but a leaked document obtained by EDRI shows that these are actually much worse than feared
(pdf), amounting to a system of continuous surveillance, extrajudicial
removal of content and some new proposals that can only be described as
deranged.
On
Techdirt.
Police and security forces around the world -- and that includes in
the West -- hate being recorded when they're overstepping the mark in
the execution of their duties, since it allows the public to challenge
official accounts, and even to use videos to seek redress.
But there's one thing worse than being recorded, and that's being
livestreamed: even the most nimble authorities can't confiscate the
recording from its creator, since it's already been uploaded for the
world to see.
On
Techdirt.
This year saw two huge victories for digital activism: against SOPA
in the US, and against ACTA in the EU. The big question is now: what
will be the next moves of those behind SOPA and ACTA as they seek to
regain the initiative? For SOPA, we've had a clue in the call for a "Son of SOPA" from the US Chamber of Commerce. But what about the European Commission?
On
Techdirt.
As the old joke goes, standards are wonderful things, that's why we
have so many of them. But who would have thought that ETSI, the
European Telecommunications Standards Institute, has already produced a
draft standard on how European governments can snoop on cloud-based
services like Facebook and Gmail -- even when encrypted connections are
used?
On
Techdirt.
One of the earliest proposals for mass surveillance was the Panopticon:
On
Techdirt.
We knew it was coming, and here it is: the Communications Data Bill (.pdf.). First the good news:
On
Open Enterprise blog.
As expected, the UK government has published its Draft Communications Bill
(pdf) -- better known as the "snooper's charter," since it requires
ISPs to record key information about every email sent and Web site
visited by UK citizens, and mobile phone companies to log all their
calls (landline information is already recorded).
On
Techdirt.