skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Techdirt has already noted how the NSA's massive spying programs around the world are costing US companies money through lost business -- and are likely to cost them even more in the future. But it seems that the fallout is even wider, as this story from The Voice of Russia makes clear:
On
Techdirt.
Back in June we wrote about Hadopi's first and only successful disconnection
case. As we also noted then, in the wake of its abject failure, Hadopi
was being dramatically curtailed. In particular, disconnection is no
longer available as a punishment for those alleged to have downloaded
files without authorization.
On
Techdirt.
Now that Sarkozy has been thrown out of office, France is no longer
producing the steady stream of bad proposals for the Internet that it
once generated. That has left an opening for some other country to take
its place, and it seems that Russia is keen to pick up where Sarkozy
left off. We've been reporting on previous worrying developments there, and TorrentFreak has news on another one:
On
Techdirt.
As we've noted before, Hadopi has been a colossal failure
on just about every metric, and now seems on the way out. But French
taxpayers' money is still being wasted on the scheme, which continues to
send out huge numbers of warnings. Ironically, given its imminent
demise, Hadopi seems to have finally claimed its first disconnection
victim, as PC Inpact reports (original in French.)
The person involved has been sentenced to disconnection for 15 days,
and must pay a €600 fine. Strangely, it seems that he or she shared
only a couple of works, so even that brief period seems harsh. However,
there is still scope for an appeal, so the sentence is not yet definite.
On
Techdirt.
A couple of weeks ago, Techdirt wrote about a store that was trying to charge customers $5 for "just looking", because it felt that many people were merely inspecting goods there before then buying them online. Guillaume Champeau points us to a French politician who is also worried about the same problem, and hasproposed modifying the law governing commerce to deal with it (original in French). Here's the politician's explanation in the preamble of why it is needed:
Last week, we wrote about an organization that was unhappy that a Wikipedia article no longer existed. Now we have the opposite problem: an organization unhappy because a Wikipedia article does exist. And not just any organization, but the "Direction Centrale du Renseignement Intéieur" (Central Directorate of Interior Intelligence, DCRI), a French intelligence agency, which suddenly decided that an article about a military base contained classified information, and wanted it deleted. As the English-language Wikipedia article on the subject explains:
As Techdirt noted last year, France has a regrettable habit of dreaming up really bad ideas
when it comes to the Internet, most famously with the three-strikes
scheme, now known there by the name of the body the oversees it --
Hadopi. Guillaume Champeau points us to a piece in the French newspaper Libération, which contains yet more appalling possibilities (original in French).
On
Techdirt.
Long-time readers will remember the appalling way in which the UK's
Digital Economy Act was brought in - with no research, no debate, and
no democracy. At its heart lies the infamous "three strikes" idea: if
you are alleged - not proved, but merely alleged - to have shared files
online on three occasions you will be subject to some punishment.
Originally that was cutting off your hand, er, your Internet connection,
but as the discussions over implementing this unjust and punitive law
have dragged on, it's become less clear how it will actually work.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
Copyright is sometimes described as a bargain between two parties:
creators and their public. In return for receiving a government-backed
monopoly on making copies, creators promise to place their works in the
public domain at the end of the copyright term. The problem with that
narrative is that time and again, the public is cheated out of what it
is due.
On
Techdirt.
Not content with giving the world the "three strikes" approach to
copyright enforcement, France has recently shown signs of wanting to
undermine one of the Internet's foundations: net neutrality. This has
come about as a consequence of the French ISP Free's decision to block
ads on its service. As Mike noted,
this was essentially an attempt to persuade Google to pay the ISP an
extra fee to carry its traffic, even though Free's customers already do
that. That was resolved, at least for the moment, when France's Digital Economy minister Fleur Pellerin stepped in and persuaded Free to restore the ads.
On
Techdirt.
One of the extraordinary aspects of the "three strikes" approach to
copyright enforcement is its blind vindictiveness. After three or so
alleged acts of infringing on copyright, it's not one individual that's
punished, but the entire household that depends on the family Internet
connection in question, irrespective of the personal situation of those
affected. This kind of collective punishment is something that is
regarded as abhorrent in other contexts, but the power of the copyright
industries is such that several governments around the world followed
the French lead and introduced precisely this kind of scheme, and to
hell with the damage it might cause to innocent and vulnerable people
caught up in it.
Techdirt.
France's Hadopi graduated response approach, also known as "three
strikes", occupies a special place in the annals of copyright
enforcement. It pioneered the idea of punishing users accused of
sharing unauthorized copies of files, largely thanks to pressure from
the previous French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, who seems to have hated
most aspects of this new-fangled Internet thing. Sadly, other
countries took up the idea, including the UK with its awful Digital
Economy Act, New Zealand, Spain and, more recently, the US.
On
Techdirt.
One of the biggest problems with the current approach to dealing with
alleged copyright infringement is the totally disproportionate nature
of the action undertaken in response to it. The "three strikes"
collective punishment of households that is available in France, New Zealand and South Korea is one example of this. From Finland, we learn about another completely over-the-top action:
On
Techdirt.
One of the many problems with the "guilty until proven innocent"
approach to tackling unauthorized filesharing is that it's not clear
exactly who should get the punishment. For example, in France, we saw
someone convicted
not for infringement that he had committed, but something his then-wife
had done and even admitted. And it's not just spousal activity that is
problematic, as TorrentFreak reports in this interesting case from Germany:
On
Techdirt.
One of the reasons the copyright lobby has been able to get so far
with Net-hostile legislation like SOPA/PIPA and treaties like ACTA and
TPP is that the companies affected adversely -- both big Internet
players and smaller startups -- have failed to make their voice heard
effectively. That's finally starting to change, as Google ramps up its
lobbying efforts, and Net entrepreneurs start to get organised.
On
Techdirt.
Recently, Techdirt reported
on the ruling by a German court on the issue of filtering -- whether
Internet sites have a responsibility to block files continually if they
have been notified about infringing materials once, sometimes called
"Notice and Stay Down". The German court basically said they do, but
the highest French court has taken a different view (French original.)
On
Techdirt.
Last month I wrote about how the Netherlands is looking to introduce new flexibilities into its copyright laws, based on some interesting research
on copyright exceptions. There must be something in the air, because a
wide range of other groups are contemplating exactly the same approach.
On
Techdirt.
The governmental body that oversees France's "three-strikes" law, HADOPI, has already been caught once infringing
on the copyright of others -- by using a logo designed with unlicensed
fonts. Now it's been spotted using photographs without respecting the
so-called "moral rights" of the photographer, which include the right to attribution (French original),
absent on HADOPI's site. Such moral rights are taken very seriously in
France, where they are automatic, perpetual and cannot be waived
(unlike in some other jurisdictions, such as the United Kingdom.)
On
Techdirt.
The British Journal of Photography (BJP) brings us yet another story of aggressive assertion of copyright wreaking harm on artists
-- the very people it allegedly empowers. It concerns some photos in
Getty Images' stock library that have chairs in them. Because a few of
those chairs are "famous" in the sense that they were produced by a
couple of designers that worked with the architect Le Corbusier, the
heirs of those designers, together with the Le Corbusier Foundation,
have sued Getty Images in France for copyright infringement -- and won:
On
Techdirt.