skip to main |
skip to sidebar
One of the heartening recent developments in the world of digital
copyright is that we have moved on from manifestly biased surveys about
the evils of piracy and how the solution to everything is harsher
punishment for infringement and longer copyright terms, to independent
analyses that seek to understand rather than judge and lecture. There's
also been a new focus on learning what the public thinks might be an
appropriate balance for modern copyright -- something that nobody cared
about in the past.
On
Techdirt.
At the beginning of last year we reported on a Swedish study that showed that streaming services had halved
the number of people who were downloading music illegally in
Scandinavia. That's a pretty stunning figure, but of course is only one
data point, which means that people can always argue that it's not
possible to generalize. So it's good that not just one but two new
reports confirm and broaden that finding.
On
Techdirt.
I love the spring. Not, of course, because of the glorious weather,
since we don't have any. But because it's time for the annual BSA report
on piracy, which is guaranteed to provide me with hours of innocent fun
as I go through finding its methodological errors and dodgy data.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
Back in November 2011, we wrote about the Belgian music royalty
collection agency SABAM's demand for 3.4% of Internet subscriber fees as
"compensation" for online piracy in Belgium. As Tim Cushing explained
back then, this was ridiculous
on just about every level. But SABAM doesn't let little things like
that get in the way of its desperate attempt to avoid moving with the
times and coming up with new business models. So after failing dismally
to convince Europe's highest court that it could force ISPs to spy on their customers, SABAM has now moved on to suing ISPs instead, as TorrentFreak reports:
On
Techdirt.
In 2001, I published a history of free software, called "Rebel Code:
Inside Linux and the Open Source Revolution." One of the people I
interviewed for the book was Eben Moglen,
for many years the General Counsel for the Free Software Foundation,
and one of the main architects of the later versions of the GNU General
Public License. He had the following interesting thoughts on the
delivery of digital media:
On
Techdirt.
Two years ago, Techdirt wrote about the major report "Media Piracy in
Emerging Economies", which explored how media and software piracy in
emerging countries is largely a question of economics:
people and companies there simply cannot afford Western-style pricing,
and resort to alternative sourcing. That hasn't stopped media and
computer companies from demanding that governments around the world
should inflict ever-more harsh punishments on their own people.
On
Techdirt.
The demonization of file sharing by copyright maximalists blinds many
companies to the fact that it is marketing in its purest form. That's
because people naturally only share stuff they think is good, and thus
everything on file sharing networks comes with an implicit
recommendation from someone. Not only that, but those works that appear
on file sharing networks the most are, again by definition, those that
are regarded mostly highly by the filesharing public as a whole, many of
whom are young people, a key target demographic for most media
companies.
On
Techdirt.
One of the most important pieces of research to emerge last year was "Media Piracy in Emerging Economies".
A central theme was that much unauthorized copying around the world is
driven by attempts to impose Western-level prices everywhere, resulting
in media goods that are simply beyond the reach of most people in
countries whose economies are still developing.
On
Techdirt.
Last week I wrote
about the extremely short consultation period for aspects of
implementing the Digital Economy Act. Time is running out - the
consultation closes tomorrow at 5pm, so I urge you to submit something soon. It doesn't have to be very long. Here, for example, is what I am sending - short, but maybe not so sweet....
On
Open Enterprise blog.
As Techdirt has noted,
the main threat to artists is not piracy, but obscurity -- the fact
that few know they are creating interesting stuff. As passive consumers
increasingly become creators
themselves, and the competition increases, that's even more of an
issue. For writers, there's a double problem: not only do people need
to hear about a work, they also have to find the time to explore it once
acquired, and that's often a challenge in our over-filled, stressed-out
lives -- unless we're talking about haiku. Here's an unusual approach to encouraging people to find that time to read books:
On
Techdirt.
As Techdirt reported
in 2010, the passage of the Digital Economy Act was one of the most
disgraceful travesties of the UK parliamentary process in recent times;
it was badly drafted, hardly revised and then pushed through with almost
no debate in the dying moments of the previous government. Since then,
two UK ISPs -- BT and TalkTalk -- have challenged the Act in the
courts, but lost earlier this year.
On
Techdirt.
Mike recently reminded us that for some people, bizarrely, stopping "piracy" is more important than making money. Here's another example, this time from Norway:
On
Techdirt.
One of the most dishonest aspects of ACTA was its attempt to equate
genuinely dangerous products like fake medicines with totally harmless
ones like unauthorized digital copies. Fortunately, that's such an
absurd equivalence that more and more people have voiced their concerns
over it -- including the Liberals and Democrats in the European
Parliament, who cited it as one reason why they would be voting against ACTA:
On
Techdirt.