15 February 2023
08 January 2018
Incoming: Spare Slots for Freelance Work in 2018
Posted by Glyn Moody at 10:08 am 0 comments
Labels: ceta, china, copyright, encryption, europe, free software, freedom of speech, open access, open data, open science, open source, patents, privacy, surveillance, tisa, tpp, trade secrets, TTIP
20 July 2013
Double Blow Against Freedom Of Speech For Twitter Users In Turkey
Techdirt has written a few times about Turkey's difficult relationship with new technology. Unfortunately, it looks like that now includes Twitter, as two troubling decisions against users have been handed down recently. Here's the first, as reported by the Turkish Web site Hürriyet Daily News:
On Techdirt.
Posted by Glyn Moody at 7:40 pm 0 comments
Labels: censorship, freedom of speech, techdirt, turkey, twitter
20 October 2011
London 2012 Olympics Go For Gold in the Extreme 'Ambush Marketing' Law Event: 'Guilty Until Proven Innocent' – And No Streaking Allowed
The Olympic Games are not just about sporting success, but also legal excess – in particular, taking laws to extremes in order to "protect" sponsors, who are routinely elevated to the level of Greek gods during the games, with similarly superhuman rights over lesser beings like you and me.
Techdirt has already written about the UK police getting special powers to enter homes during the 2012 games, as well as free speech being curtailed. Now there are plans to suspend the presumption of innocence too:
On Techdirt.
Posted by Glyn Moody at 11:38 am 0 comments
Labels: copyright, freedom of speech, london olympics, techdirt, trademarks
18 June 2010
German Publishers Want More Monopoly Rights
Here's an almost unbelievable piece about what's happening in Germany right now:It looks as if publishers might really be lobbying for obtaining a new exclusive right conferring the power to monopolise speech e.g. by assigning a right to re-use a particular wording in the headline of a news article anywhere else without the permission of the rights holder. According to the drafts circulating in the internet, permission shall be obtainable exclusively by closing an agreement with a new collecting society which will be founded after the drafts have matured into law. Depending on the particulars, new levies might come up for each and every user of a PC, at least if the computer is used in a company for commercial purposes.
Well, obtaining monopoly protection for sentences and even parts of sentences in a natural language appears to be some kind of very strong meat. This would mean that publishers can control the wording of news messages. This comes crucially close to private control on the dissemination of facts.
But guess what? Someone thinks that German publishers aren't asking for *enough*, as the same article explains:Mr Castendyk concludes that even if the envisaged auxiliary copyright protection for newspaper language enters into law, the resulting additional revenue streams probably would be insufficient to rescue the publishing companies. He then goes a step further and postulates that publishing companies enjoy a quasi-constitutional guarantee due to their role in the society insofar the state has the obligation to maintain the conditions for their existence forever.
...
Utilising the leveraging effect of this postulated quasi-constitutional guarantee, Castendyk demands to amend cartel law in order to enable a global 'pooling' of all exclusive rights of all newspaper publishers in Germany in order to block any attempt to defect from the paywall cartell by single competitor as discussed above.
This is a beautiful demonstration of a flaw at the heart of copyright: whenever an existing business model based around a monopoly starts to fail, the reflexive approach is to demand yet more monopolies in an attempt to shore it up. And the faster people point out why that won't solve the problem, the faster the demands come for even more oppressive and unreasonable legislation to try to head off those issues.
And make no mistake: if Germany adopts this approach, there will be squeals from publishers around the world demanding "parity", just as there have been with the term of copyright. And so the ratchet will be turned once more.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca.
Posted by Glyn Moody at 6:11 pm 9 comments
Labels: freedom of speech, germany, intellectual monopolies, publishing
19 August 2009
Cor! - UK Pirate Party's Smart Move
The UK Pirate Party has published its "core beliefs":1. The reform of Copyright and Patent Laws
2. The protection of our Right to Privacy
3. The protection of our Right to Freedom of Speech
What's interesting is how tightly focussed the Pirate Party is. I think that's wise: otherwise it would just become another Raving Monster Loony Party. By restricting its message to an area that it understands, and which is crying out for reform, I'm sure it will benefit in the long run. It will also, usefully, force the other parties to frame their own responses in this domain.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter and identi.ca.
Posted by Glyn Moody at 12:14 pm 6 comments
Labels: copyright, freedom of speech, pirate party, privacy
12 March 2007
Chilling Freedom of Speech on Polar Bears
Internal memorandums circulated in the Alaskan division of the Federal Fish and Wildlife Service appear to require government biologists or other employees traveling in countries around the Arctic not to discuss climate change, polar bears or sea ice if they are not designated to do so.
Like them, I am speechless.
Posted by Glyn Moody at 3:37 pm 0 comments
Labels: alaska, censorship, freedom of speech, george w bush, global warming, polar bears, sea ice