skip to main |
skip to sidebar
It would be something of understatement to say that the spiralling
cost of healthcare has become a highly-charged political issue in the US
(and elsewhere). But wherever people stand on the funding of medicine,
there is an implicit assumption that it works, and is worth even the
exorbitant prices that pharmaceutical companies may charge. Sadly,
that's often not true.
On
Techdirt.
Yesterday I was writing about open access and open data in the context of the EU's
Horizon 2020 initiative. Closer to home, I came across a wonderful
real-life example of how open data can almost certainly save not just
money, but lives.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
It's a cliché that we live in a world increasingly awash with digital
data. Even though it all comes down to 1s and 0s, not all data is
equally important or valuable. Data about clinical trials, for example,
is literally a matter of life and death, since it is used to determine
whether new drugs should be approved and how they should be used. That
gives clinical data a critical role in the approval process: results
that support the use of a new drug can lead to big profits, while
negative results can mean years of expensive research and development
have to be discarded.
On
Techdirt.
Open data continues to spread around the world - here's a great recent summary
of what's happening where. But simply making government data available
is no longer enough: now we need to move on to the far trickier job of
doing something with it.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
It seems a long while ago now, but June was a pretty hectic month in this neck of the woods, since it saw the final push to get ACTA rejected
in the European Parliament. But of course, plenty of other things were
happening then, and one in particular that I wanted to cover was the
release of this UK Open Data White Paper entitled "Unleashing the Potential".
On
Open Enterprise blog.
Techdirt often writes about the benefits of openness and sharing.
One area that is increasingly coming to the fore is open data -- for
example, for some time both the US and UK
have had major projects aimed at opening up the stores of data held by
their respective governments, and other countries are rapidly joining
the club. But amidst all the enthusiasm for such projects, it's easy to
get swept away, and to accept the idea of open data uncritically.
That's what makes this fascinating blog post entitled "Seeing Like a
Geek" from Tom Slee so valuable, because he calls out what he sees as a serious problem with open data initiatives:
On
Techdirt.
As I've noted before, open data is one area where the UK government
shines - unlike open source, where it has yet to deliver the goods. One
of its bright ideas was the creation of an Open Data Institute (ODI),
which I wrote about at the end of last year. It still doesn't exist yet, but it does have a Web site with some interesting further information about its intentions.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
Neelie Kroes gave a keynote speech at this year's re:publica conference in Berlin
(disclosure: I spoke there too) that brought together many of the
themes she has touched on recently -- the open Web, copyright licensing,
the potential of open data, and the need to provide enhanced Internet
safety for children. Interesting and important as all those are, they
pale into insignificance beside the following comment she made:
On
Techdirt.
Back in October I wrote
about a UK government consultation on the subject of the proposed
Public Data Corporation. The government has now responded with one of
its well-written documents [pdf]. Here's part of the executive summary:
On
Open Enterprise blog.
The progress made by the open data movement is pretty extraordinary.
A few years ago, data was something that only statisticians cared
about, but today it is one of the most vibrant areas of exploration and
innovation. I think that's in part because of open source's example of
how opening things up allows people to experiment and make progress
faster than keeping everything locked down.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
As readers of this blog will have noticed, open data is particularly
hot at the moment. Whether that will endure is another matter, but for
the moment we should be grateful for all the politicians jumping on this
particular bandwagon, and we should grab the open data they are
releasing with both hands while we can. Here's the latest convert, the European Commission itself:
On
Open Enterprise blog.
In striking contrast with its disappointing performance in terms of
supporting open source, the UK government continues to take huge strides
in the world of open data. Details about its latest moves are
contained in this document [.pdf] that came out of the recent 2011 Autumn Statement:
On
Open Enterprise blog.
Last week I was invited to talk at the South Tyrol Free Software Conference
which took place in northern Italy, in the city of Bolzano (disclosure:
a paid gig.) As its title indicates, this was a more local,
specialised conference than some of its more famous international
siblings, but I was impressed just how much activity was going on. It
was also interesting to see that open data was already a hot topic here -
it's not just national holdings that are being opened up.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
There seems to be something in the air (maybe it's the crazy weather): everyone is making “declarations”.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
A couple of weeks ago, I wrote about the “Making Data Real”consultation,
promising to post my response. I have to admit that replying to the
questions it asks has been far harder for this than for any other
consultation that I've responded to.
I should hasten to add that this is not from any failing in the
consultation itself. Indeed, it is commendably thorough both in its
exposition of the issues, and in terms of the questions posed. But
that's almost the problem: it is asking very deep questions in an area
where few people - myself included - have really managed to frame
anything like coherent responses.
On
Open Enterprise blog.