skip to main |
skip to sidebar
So, once again, the Business Software Alliance (BSA) has come out
with its annual report on software piracy around the world, entitled
"Shadow Market" [.pdf]. And, once again, it makes all the same methodological mistakes - it's almost as if the BSA hasn't been reading my critiques of last year and the year before....
On
Open Enterprise blog.
Even though just about every objective statistic suggests otherwise, the copyright industries still take turns bemoaning the terrible toll that piracy is supposedly taking on their markets. So it's good to come across some official figures that suggest the contrary, particularly because in this case they come from the European Audiovisual Observatory—not a market research company, but a public service body. Here are the latest numbers for the European film industry:
On
Techdirt.
One of the beloved tropes of the copyright industries is that they
are being destroyed by online piracy. Superficially, it's a plausible
claim, not least because of the false equation of copyright infringement
with "theft", and the lingering suggestion that every time something is
shared online, a sale is lost. Of course, as Techdirt's report, "The Sky is Rising", demonstrated from publicly-available figures, the facts are very different: all of the creative industries are thriving.
On
Techdirt.
One of the favorite tropes of the anti-piracy crowd is that all this
unauthorized sharing is killing culture, pauperizing artists and
generally making the world go to hell in a handbasket. The only pieces
of evidence adduced in support of that position are the market reports
put together for the copyright industries that (a) say the sky is
falling and (b) base that analysis on the industries' own unsubstantiated claims.
On
Techdirt.
As far as we can tell, ACTA has been put on
hold for months, maybe even a year, while the European Court of Justice
(ECJ) considers its compatibility or otherwise with European laws. But
that doesn't mean everything has stopped. The European Parliament has
begun examining ACTA from various viewpoints through its committees.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
As Techdirt reported
earlier this year, Spain's Sinde Law, designed to combat file sharing
by blocking sites with allegedly infringing material, has an extremely
complex history. It finally went into effect on 1 March, and was
immediately met with a clever denial of service attack from a Spanish group with the self-explanatory name "Hackivistas". As TorrentFreak explains:
On
Techdirt.
Even though the European Commission has referred
ACTA to the European Court of Justice, the European Parliament
continues to examine the treaty in its various committees. Earlier this
week, the one dealing with International Trade
met for a preliminary discussion. One of the key speakers was the
Commissioner responsible for ACTA, Karel De Gucht, who naturally tried
to make light of the many problems that have been raised in recent
weeks.
On
Techdirt.
As Techdirt noted
recently, policy-making behind closed doors is no longer acceptable.
Until the end of the 20th century, it was hard for the general public to
make their views heard, and so governments didn't really bother asking
them. But that's no longer the case: the Internet has blown government
wide open, and there is now no excuse for not consulting as widely as
possible -- including the public -- before passing legislation or
signing treaties.
On
Techdirt.
Although DMCA takedown notices figure quite frequently here on
Techdirt -- especially abusive ones that use the system to remove
material covered by fair use or even in the public domain
-- the industry that has grown up around them remains somewhat in the
shadows. That's what makes the site with the self-explanatory name "Takedown Piracy", found via the 1709 Blog, so fascinating: it offers a glimpse of the world of DMCA takedowns as seen from the other side.
On
Techdirt.
Yesterday I wrote
about the unusual aspects of the Serious Organised Crime Agency's
take-down of the music site RnBXclusive. As I noted then, there are
still lots of questions to be answered here, but another piece of the
puzzle has been given to us in the form of the following statement on SOCA's Web site:
On
Open Enterprise blog.
Few ideas display a sense of entitlement better than that of private
copying levies. For they assume, by definition, that artists'
representatives have a right to money from the public simply because
there is some kind of storage that could be used to hold digital
copies of copyright files, and that every time such a file is copied,
money must be paid (never mind if you are just making backups or
transferring your holdings to bigger storage sizes.)
On
Techdirt.
One of the positive outcomes of the debate that has raged around
SOPA/PIPA is that more people have looked at the facts, rather than
listened to the rhetoric, surrounding piracy. In particular, the
copyright industries' hitherto unchallenged claim that piracy is
destroying their business is finally being challenged – not least by
reports like "The Sky is Rising" that consolidate industry figures to show that things are really looking pretty good across the board.
On
Open Enterprise..
One of the positive outcomes of the debate that has raged around
SOPA/PIPA is that more people have looked at the facts, rather than
listened to the rhetoric, surrounding piracy. In particular, the
copyright industries' hitherto unchallenged claim that piracy is
destroying their business is finally being challenged – not least by
reports like "The Sky is Rising" that consolidate industry figures to show that things are really looking pretty good across the board.
On
Techdirt.
Last Year Techdirt wrote
about the case of the huge collection of historic jazz recordings that
had been acquired by the US National Jazz Museum. The central problem is
that even if the recordings can be digitized before they deteriorate,
very few people will hear them because of their complicated copyright
status.
On
Techdirt.
We've written
about the hugely-successful Brazilian writer Paulo Coelho many times
before, because he is a great example of an artist embracing piracy as a
boon not a bane. So it's great to see him offering his thoughts on SOPA:
On
Techdirt.
For a long time, the copyright industries have taken the position
that they won't launch new digital music services until piracy is
"solved" – or at least punished. The inevitable consequence of that
position is obvious to everyone outside the copyright industries –
people turn to other, unauthorized sources to satisfy their musical
needs. Fortunately, a few startups have launched pioneering digital
music offerings and some, like Spotify, look like they might succeed.
On
Techdirt.
So the Tweedledum and Tweedledee of copyright maximalist legislation, SOPA and PIPA, have
been halted in their passage through the US legislative process. Of
course, they're not dead, but are sure to return, zombie-like, either as
modified versions of the current texts or new ones that turn out to be
exactly the same as the old ones at their heart. However, the
unprecedented action by the Net world to get the message across that
these bills were not fit for purpose does mean that our attention can
swivel back to somewhere else where bad things are happening: ACTA.
On Open Enterprise blog.
One of the favorite techniques of those pushing for ever-more severe
penalties for copyright infringement is to blur the distinction between
analog counterfeits and digital copies. The argument then becomes:
"counterfeit drugs can kill people, therefore we must come down hard on
online filesharing." This trick can be seen most clearly in ACTA, which
stands for "Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement", but where the most
problematic sections concern digital piracy, not counterfeits.
On
Techdirt.
Earlier this week Techdirt reported on the surprisingly forthright statements of Neelie Kroes concerning the failure of the copyright system in the digital world. She made her remarks at the Forum d'Avignon in France, which was about "strengthening the links between culture and the economy".
On
Techdirt.