skip to main |
skip to sidebar
A recent Techdirt post reminded
us that thanks to its crazy copyright laws, the US won't be seeing
anything new in the public domain for many years. But even in those
"fortunate" countries that get to use cultural works a mere 70 years
after the creator's death, the situation is still pretty absurd.
On
Techdirt.
Just before Christmas I wrote a fairly strongly-worded condemnation of what I saw as the imminent betrayal
of open standards by the UK Cabinet Office. This was based on reading
between the lines of a new Procurement Policy Note, plus my thirty
years' experience of dealing with Microsoft. At the time, I didn't have
any specific proof that Microsoft was behind this shameful U-turn, but Mark Ballard has, it seems:
On
Open Enterprise blog.
One of the many dangerous aspects of SOPA/PIPA is that its backers seem
to have given no thought to what the unintended consequences might be.
In particular, there is no awareness that it might wreak serious damage
in areas that are very distant from the core concerns of unauthorized
copies of music or films – such as scientific publishing.
On
Techdirt.
A fascinating trend in recent years has been the gradual move from a
presumption of secrecy to one of openness, transparency and sharing.
This began with free software/open source, and has progressively spread
to include areas such as open content, open access, open data, open
science and open government.
Here's the latest field where people are advocating a more open approach:
On
Techdirt.
Against the background of today's war on sharing, exemplified by SOPA
and PIPA, traditional libraries underline an inconvenient truth:
allowing people to share things – principally books in the case of
libraries – does not lead to the collapse of the industry trying to sell
those same things. But publishers really don't seem to have learned
that lesson, judging by this article in the New York Times about the nonsensical attitude they have to libraries lending out ebooks:
On
Techdirt.
One of the central questions the Wikipedia community grapples with is:
What exactly is Wikipedia trying to achieve? For example, does it
aspire to be a total encyclopedia of everything? What is the
appropriate level of detail?
On
Techdirt.
Perhaps there's something about the German legal system that encourages
judges to push their interpretation of the law to the limit, without any
concern for whether the results of that logic are absurd. At least
that is the impression you might get from two recent cases whose
judgments both make use of the internet by ordinary citizens increasing
fraught with legal risks.
On
Techdirt.
At the end of last year I reported
on the worrying signs of vacillation from the UK government over its
support for truly open standards. At least it's relatively
straightforward to keep tabs on what's happening in Blighty; Europe is
another matter - I find the labyrinthine bureaucracy and its digital
shadow pretty hard to navigate. So I was pleased to come across the
following page, entitled "Strategy for internal use of OSS at the EC".
On
Open Enterprise blog.
Already it's clear that one of the hot tech topics of 2012 will be "The
Internet of Things" – the idea that even the most mundane objects will
be hooked up to the Net and communicating over it. So far, pundits have
concentrated on trivial applications like being able to check your
fridge's contents from a browser, but potentially it could be much more
than that if the "things" are groups of sensors whose data can be
usefully aggregated.
On
Techdirt.
In my last column,
I suggested that one of the best things that Mozilla could do in order
to promote the Open Web and openness in general would be to support the
battle for online freedom in more general ways. That's something it has
already started doing, notably in trying to halt the passage of the
awful Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) that is currently grinding through the US legislative process.
On
The H Open.
By their very nature, drug patents can create monopolies that allow
prices to be kept artificially high. In other domains that may be
simply an annoyance or inconvenience, but in the world of medicines, it
can be a matter of life or death for those unable to afford those
inflated prices.
On
Techdirt.
One of the striking features of some of the most successful startups
over the last ten years – companies like Google, Facebook and Twitter –
is that their infrastructure is based almost entirely around open
source. Of course, that shouldn't really be surprising: open source
allows people to get prototypes up and running for the price of a PC,
which is great for trying out ideas with live code. And yet despite
these zero-cost origins, open source software scales up to supercomputing levels - the perfect solution for startups that hope to grow.
On
Techdirt.
One of the great tasks facing humanity today is digitizing the world's
books and liberating the huge stores of knowledge they contain. The
technology is there – scanners are now relatively fast and cheap – but
the legal framework is struggling to keep up. That can be seen in the
continuing uncertainty hovering over Google's massive book scanning project. It can also be observed in some recent digitization projects like Cambridge University's Digital Library:
On
Techdirt.
As the battle rages over SOPA and PIPA, censorship is very much on
people's minds. But there are many different kinds of censorship,
operating at different levels of precision. For example, while some
forms are crude and inexact, like Homeland Security's shutdown of 84,000 sites, others are highly targeted, and designed to block in a very specific way.
On
Techdirt.
Copyright maximalism has proceeded along two axes. The first is the
term of copyright, which has been steadily extended from the basic 14
years of the 1710 Statute of Anne to today's life + 50 or 70 years,
depending on the jurisdiction.
The other is the scope of copyright, where there are constant attempts
to make yet more fields of human endeavor subject to it – for example fashion or food.
On
Techdirt.
As this timeline
indicates, Brazil's attempts to draw up a copyright reform bill have
been dragging on for five years now. That in itself wouldn't matter too
much – the process of updating major laws is by its very nature a
complex and slow process; but during those five years there has been a
change of administration, and with it, apparently, some major shifts in
policy.
On
Techdirt.
Back in February of this year, I wrote about PPN 3/11, a Cabinet Office “Procurement Policy Note - Use of Open Standards when specifying ICT requirements” [.pdf], which contained the following excellent definition of open standards:
On
Open Enterprise blog.
Those with good memories may recall the following amusing episode when BT wanted to sue people for daring to use its super-duper patented hyperlink invention:
On
Open Enterprise blog.
QuestionCopyright has an interesting article about the role that open access might play in opening up China to new ideas. But what really caught my attention was the following section:
On
Techdirt.
Trey Ratcliff is an extremely successful photographer, who specializes in HDR photography. His blog Stuck in Customs is the top travel photography blog on the internet, with over a million views each week.
On
Techdirt.
The latest big boost to open access has come from in UK government's "Innovation and research strategy for growth" (pdf), which says:
On
Techdirt.
The contentious nature of the "three strikes" response to unauthorized
sharing of copyright materials can be seen by the legal battles being
fought around it across Europe. That's particularly the case in
Ireland, which has emerged as a key testing ground for the approach and
its legality.
On
Techdirt.
At the end of last week, the Council of the European Union – which is
where national ministers from each EU country meet to adopt laws and
coordinate policies – had a meeting. A group of some 40 ministers for
agriculture and fisheries signed off on a range of important matters,
including:
On
Techdirt.
Apple has been garnering quite a reputation for itself as a patent bully, for example using patents around the world in an attempt to stop Samsung competing in the tablet market, and bolstering patent trolls. But that's not enough for the company, it seems: now it wants to use patents to block open standards.
On
Techdirt.
Most people instinctively appreciate the dangers of government
surveillance. But at least it's possible to be on your guard when you
suspect such surveillance may be present by taking care what you write
and send. You might even use some industrial-grade encryption for the
important stuff.
On
Techdirt.