skip to main |
skip to sidebar
One of the useful side-effects of the groundswell of protest against
SOPA and PIPA is that a surprising number of people in positions of
power have come out against their approach, notably in Europe. First,
we had Neelie Kroes, Vice President of the European Commission
responsible for the Digital Agenda for Europe, who tweeted:
On
Techdirt.
One new approach to teasing apart the complex relationships between
genes and common diseases such as cancer, heart disease, asthma and
diabetes is by creating huge biobanks of medical data and samples. The
idea is that by tracking the health and habits of very large populations
across many years, and then examining their DNA, it will be possible to
spot factors in common. Here's a major biobank that is shortly opening up its holdings for research:
On
Techdirt.
Given its general contempt for the repeated attempts to close it
down, you wouldn't expect The Pirate Bay to be particularly worried by
SOPA. But in its very own press release on the subject,
it goes much further: it flings the ultimate insult at Hollywood by
claiming that not only are the two of them spiritual kin, but that The
Pirate Bay is the New Hollywood.
On
Techdirt.
There is a rather odd atmosphere within the parts of the online
community that fought so hard against SOPA this week – relief that all
that work seems to have had an effect, mixed with a certain disbelief
that for once the outside world sat up and took notice of the tech
world's concerns. Amidst all the justified back-patting, there is a
temptation to celebrate the fact that both SOPA and PIPA are "delayed", and to move on.
On Techdirt.
Since SOPA and PIPA are US bills, the focus has naturally been on the
US response to them – notably in the list of major sites that
participated in the blackout, or who have otherwise protested against
the proposed legislation. But it's important to remember that the whole
rationale of these new laws is tackling copyright infringement outside the US.
On
Techdirt.
Canonical pulled off something of a coup at the recent Consumer Electronics Show (CES) when it announced its Ubuntu TV – inevitably dubbed "TV for human beings":
On
The H Open.
A couple of months ago, Techdirt wrote about an EU politician's plan
to build Internet surveillance into every operating system. As we
pointed out then, this could easily be circumvented by using non-Net
means for swapping files. It may not be driven by fears about spying,
but it seems that communities in Western Africa are using Bluetooth connections between mobile phones to do exactly that:
On
Techdirt.
The role of technology in the wave of protests that swept the world last
year is a matter of debate. While some claim that social networks and
mobile phones allowed protesters to organize themselves with an
unprecedented speed and efficiency, others have seen their role as
marginal – or even counterproductive, since these same technologies also
allow governments to monitor events with greater ease than in
pre-Internet days.
Techdirt.
Among the many high-profile organizations that are joining the SOPA
blackout today is Greenpeace. That's great, except that you can't read
an important post on the Greenpeace UK web site about why it is opposing
SOPA and PIPA (it should be available at 5 pm PST from the home page or here.
On
Techdirt.
One of the more unfortunate consequences of Moore's Law is that
technologies that erode privacy are becoming cheaper every year – and
hence more attractive to governments eager to spy on their own populace.
The latest to heed the siren call of mass surveillance is Argentina.
On
Techdirt.
So the long-awaited verdict
on the extradition of Richard O’Dwyer has finally arrived, and, as
feared, it's ridiculous. There are many others better qualified than I
am to comment on the detailed legal issues of the lop-sided extradition
treaty that lies at the heart of the case, so I would like to
concentrate on two aspects that I feel better able to comment on. Both
touch on what I think are fatal errors in the judgment; either is enough
undermine its arguments.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
A few weeks back, Techdirt reported on an Indian minister asking Internet companies to do the impossible:
On
Techdirt.
Against a background where some European courts are telling ISPs that they must block access to certain sites (in Finland and the UK, for example), this news from Germany comes as a refreshing change (original German article in Der Spiegel):
On
Techdirt.
You don't have to be a marketing genius or industry pundit to foresee
that tablets will be an extremely hot sector in 2012. The launch of
Apple's iPad in 2010 largely defined the category, just as the launch of
the iPhone defined a new kind of smartphone in 2007; in 2012 we will
probably begin to see Android tablets start to gain major market share
just as Android smartphones have done this year.
On
Techdirt.
Back in September last year, there was a bit of a to-do about Microsoft's UEFI Secure Boot technology in Windows 8, when a Red Hat engineer posted the following:
On
Open Enterprise blog.
If we are to believe the early signs, 2012 may well be the year that
British schools finally start to address the continuing shame that is ICT teaching.
As I and many others have noted, the current approach essentially
consists of sitting people in front of Microsoft Word and Excel and
making them learn a couple of commands on the menus. It seems that the
message has finally got through to the powers-that-be:
On
Open Enterprise blog.
There's a wonderful line in Fred Brooks' book "The Mythical
Man-Month", where he says that when writing a program, plan to throw one
way - you will anyway. But that's a bit of a problem for conventional
software development, because it's not clear when the best time is to
throw that one away.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
A recent Techdirt post reminded
us that thanks to its crazy copyright laws, the US won't be seeing
anything new in the public domain for many years. But even in those
"fortunate" countries that get to use cultural works a mere 70 years
after the creator's death, the situation is still pretty absurd.
On
Techdirt.
Just before Christmas I wrote a fairly strongly-worded condemnation of what I saw as the imminent betrayal
of open standards by the UK Cabinet Office. This was based on reading
between the lines of a new Procurement Policy Note, plus my thirty
years' experience of dealing with Microsoft. At the time, I didn't have
any specific proof that Microsoft was behind this shameful U-turn, but Mark Ballard has, it seems:
On
Open Enterprise blog.
One of the many dangerous aspects of SOPA/PIPA is that its backers seem
to have given no thought to what the unintended consequences might be.
In particular, there is no awareness that it might wreak serious damage
in areas that are very distant from the core concerns of unauthorized
copies of music or films – such as scientific publishing.
On
Techdirt.
A fascinating trend in recent years has been the gradual move from a
presumption of secrecy to one of openness, transparency and sharing.
This began with free software/open source, and has progressively spread
to include areas such as open content, open access, open data, open
science and open government.
Here's the latest field where people are advocating a more open approach:
On
Techdirt.
Against the background of today's war on sharing, exemplified by SOPA
and PIPA, traditional libraries underline an inconvenient truth:
allowing people to share things – principally books in the case of
libraries – does not lead to the collapse of the industry trying to sell
those same things. But publishers really don't seem to have learned
that lesson, judging by this article in the New York Times about the nonsensical attitude they have to libraries lending out ebooks:
On
Techdirt.
One of the central questions the Wikipedia community grapples with is:
What exactly is Wikipedia trying to achieve? For example, does it
aspire to be a total encyclopedia of everything? What is the
appropriate level of detail?
On
Techdirt.
Perhaps there's something about the German legal system that encourages
judges to push their interpretation of the law to the limit, without any
concern for whether the results of that logic are absurd. At least
that is the impression you might get from two recent cases whose
judgments both make use of the internet by ordinary citizens increasing
fraught with legal risks.
On
Techdirt.