skip to main |
skip to sidebar
This is a continuation of my previous post examining the European
Commission's attempt to dispel what it calls ten "myths" about ACTA [.pdf].
I'm commenting only on the most egregious attempts by the Commission
to talk away the issues - it would be too tedious to go through every
point in detail.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
Publishers find themselves confronted by a difficult dilemma at the
moment. On the one hand, they might want e-books to succeed, because
digital devices represent a huge new market to which they can sell their
back catalogs. On the other, they might want them to fail, because
e-books will cannibalize sales of traditional books, and it's not yet
clear how low the price of e-books will have to go in order to avoid the
kind of piracy problems the recording industry exacerbated through
persistent overcharging.
On
Techdirt.
It's a sign of the European Commission's increasing desperation over ACTA that it has been forced to send out a document entitled "10 Myths About ACTA" [.pdf] that purports to debunk misinformation that is being put around. Unsurprisingly, the EC's
document is itself full of misinformation; over the next few days I'll
be going through some of its most egregious attempts to obfuscate and
generally explain away the deep problems of ACTA.
On Open Enterprise blog.
With all the heat
that publishers are starting to feel from the academic community, you
might have thought that they'd avoid upsetting anyone else. But it
seems that some publishers have decided to go after lawyers who make
patent applications that include copies of academic articles as prior
art. As the PatentlyO blog explains:
On
Techdirt.
Nicolas Sarkozy, the President of France, has the sad distinction of
being in the vanguard when it comes to really bad ideas concerning the
Internet. On his initiative, France became the testing-ground for the
three-strikes approach of throwing people off the Internet upon multiple
accusations of copyright infringement, without the need for proof or a
court order, known there as HADOPI. He also helped put into circulation a view that is much in vogue at the moment:
On
Techdirt.
With the immediate threat from SOPA/PIPA on hold, people have started
to turn their attention to the long-running saga of ACTA. While it was
being negotiated behind closed doors, few people knew about it, and
protests against it were muted. Now that it has finally emerged into
the open and begins its last dash towards the finishing line of
ratification, the pace of anti-ACTA activism is beginning to pick up
quickly. That's especially true in Europe, where everything hinges on
the result of the European Parliament's vote on the treaty later this
year. If it rejects it, ACTA is dead.
On
Techdirt.
Although ACTA is billed as a global treaty,
there are only two participants that really matter: the US and the
European Union. If either of those dropped out, it would be completely
ineffectual.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
A key element of the political rhetoric around SOPA/PIPA was the idea that it was about jobs,
and that jobs are so critical in the current economic climate that
safeguarding them overrides any other concern the Net world might have
about the means being proposed to do that. But then the key question
becomes: who are really more important in terms of those jobs - the
copyright industries, or companies exploiting the potential of the
Internet that would be harmed if the Net were hobbled by new
legislation?
On
Techdirt.
Last Year Techdirt wrote
about the case of the huge collection of historic jazz recordings that
had been acquired by the US National Jazz Museum. The central problem is
that even if the recordings can be digitized before they deteriorate,
very few people will hear them because of their complicated copyright
status.
On
Techdirt.
Numerous Wikileaks cables have highlighted the pressure that the US has
brought to bear on several foreign governments behind closed doors in an
attempt to get the latter to pass maximalist copyright laws. But it's
worth noting that plenty of arm twisting takes place openly. Here, for
example, is a letter (pdf) from the American Chamber of Commerce in Estonia addressed to the Minister of Justice, and the Minister of Economic Affairs and Communications of that country:
On
Techdirt.
Anyone who follows me on Twitter or identi.ca, or on Google+
will have noticed something of a crescendo of posts about the
Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) recently. There are two
reasons for this.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
The annual Digital Music Report (pdf)
of the International Federation for the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) is
a curiously conflicted production. On the one hand, it must celebrate
"a healthy 8 per cent increase in our digital revenues in 2011 -- the
first time the annual growth rate has risen since records began in 2004
"; on the other, it must continue to push the party line about how the
industry is being destroyed by piracy.
On
Techdirt.
Twitter has taken quite a lot of heat
for putting in place the capability to block tweets on a geographical
basis. This begins to look a little unfair in light of the fact that
Google quietly adopted a similar policy before Twitter. That's shown by
the answer to a question on Google's Blogger site about blogs being redirected to country-specific URLs, which at the time of writing was last updated on 9 January 2012. Here's what it says:
On
Techdirt.
Can the future aggregate actions of people be predicted from relevant
sets of data that describe them? That, of course, is what Isaac
Asimov's invented mathematical discipline of psychohistory was supposed to do. Some Japanese researchers claim to have made some progress towards that goal:
On
Techdirt.
It's now widely recognized that the extreme demands of SOPA/PIPA
catalyzed a new activism within the Net world, epitomized by the
blackout effected by sites like Wikipedia on January 18. But as
Techdirt has reported, SOPA and PIPA are not the only attacks by the
copyright industries on the digital commons: another is the Research Works Act (RWA), which attempts to remove the public's right to read the articles written by tax-funded researchers in open access journals form.
On
Techdirt.
Open source lies at the heart of Google – it runs a modified form of
Linux on its vast server farms, and uses many other free software
programs in its operations. This makes giving back to the open source
community not just the right thing to do but enlightened self-interest:
the stronger free software becomes, the more Google can build upon it
(cynics would say feed off it).
On
The H Open.
One of the recurrent themes on Techdirt is the sense of entitlement
the owners of various kinds of monopolies display, and their common
belief that being able to maximize the profit from those monopolies
trumps any other consideration.
On
Techdirt.
Well, this one's bizarre. Back in March 2010 we wrote
about the UK Usenet aggregator Newzbin being found liable for the
copyright infringment of its users. A year later, the ISP BT was
ordered to block access to Newzbin2, its successor. What amounted to the UK's first Internet censorship order was upheld soon afterwards.
On
Techdirt.
We've written
about the hugely-successful Brazilian writer Paulo Coelho many times
before, because he is a great example of an artist embracing piracy as a
boon not a bane. So it's great to see him offering his thoughts on SOPA:
On
Techdirt.
After years of unforgivable inaction, the education world is finally
addressing the continuing disgrace that is computer teaching in this
country. A couple of weeks ago I wrote about the UK Education Secretary Michael Gove's comments on this area, and now we have the Royal Society's report on computing in schools.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
For a long time, the copyright industries have taken the position
that they won't launch new digital music services until piracy is
"solved" – or at least punished. The inevitable consequence of that
position is obvious to everyone outside the copyright industries –
people turn to other, unauthorized sources to satisfy their musical
needs. Fortunately, a few startups have launched pioneering digital
music offerings and some, like Spotify, look like they might succeed.
On
Techdirt.
So the Tweedledum and Tweedledee of copyright maximalist legislation, SOPA and PIPA, have
been halted in their passage through the US legislative process. Of
course, they're not dead, but are sure to return, zombie-like, either as
modified versions of the current texts or new ones that turn out to be
exactly the same as the old ones at their heart. However, the
unprecedented action by the Net world to get the message across that
these bills were not fit for purpose does mean that our attention can
swivel back to somewhere else where bad things are happening: ACTA.
On Open Enterprise blog.