skip to main |
skip to sidebar
In my previous post
about submitting a reply to the UK government consultation on
copyright, I concentrated on one area, that of orphan works. That's
arguably the second most-important topic that the report discusses, not
least because of the huge potential liberating orphan works has. But
without doubt, the most important area is that of exceptions to
copyright.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
If there's a common trait of the various rightsholders groups around
the world, it is their sense of entitlement. If anyone does anything
with a work under copyright, they feel they have a right to regulate it
and be paid for it. A good example is the claim
by the Authors Guild that owners of Kindles weren't allowed to use an
experimental text-to-speech feature, since that would infringe on the
entirely made up concept of "audio rights" -- and hence, presumably,
require further payment.
On
Techdirt.
The progress made by the open data movement is pretty extraordinary.
A few years ago, data was something that only statisticians cared
about, but today it is one of the most vibrant areas of exploration and
innovation. I think that's in part because of open source's example of
how opening things up allows people to experiment and make progress
faster than keeping everything locked down.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
Now that the EU's ratification of ACTA has departed from the original
script of everyone just waving it through, the European Commission is
clearly trying to come up with Plan B. Some insights into its thinking
can be gained from the minutes (pdf) of a recent Commission meeting, pointed out to us by André Rebentisch.
On
Techdirt.
As Michael Geist
and others have pointed out, ACTA is the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade
Agreement without the main sources of counterfeits being involved --
notably, China. This has required some skilful footwork on the part of
ACTA supporters, who need to justify the ratification of a
loosely-worded treaty with potentially harmful effects on Internet
service providers, civil liberties and developing countries, but which
doesn't provide the key benefit claimed in its name.
Here's how the European Union's representatives tried to deal with this issue in a "statement on IP Enforcement Trends" made at the WTO Council for TRIPS:
On
Techdirt.
Although ACTA has now been referred
by the European Commission to the European Court of Justice, it
continues its passage through the various committees of the European
Parliament, each of which will provide input on the final decision of
whether to ratify ACTA or not. The first of these took place last week,
when the International Trade (INTA) committee had a preliminary ACTA
workshop. This included hearing from external experts, one of whom was
Michael Geist, well known to Techdirt readers.
On
Techdirt.
One of the common assumptions in the copyright debate is that artists
are special, and that they have a right to make money from their works
repeatedly, in ways not granted to "ordinary" workers like plumbers or
train drivers, thanks to copyright's reach through time and space. Of
course, when modern copyright was devised in the early 18th century,
artists were special in the sense they were scarce; offering them
special monopoly privileges "for the encouragement of learning" as the
1710 Statute of Anne puts it, therefore made sense.
On
Techdirt.
As far as we can tell, ACTA has been put on
hold for months, maybe even a year, while the European Court of Justice
(ECJ) considers its compatibility or otherwise with European laws. But
that doesn't mean everything has stopped. The European Parliament has
begun examining ACTA from various viewpoints through its committees.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
The Raspberry Pi is a $25 credit-card sized computer
that has succeeded in making GNU/Linux not just newsworthy, but
downright desirable. The initial batch of boards sold out in minutes,
and eager customers crashed the server where it was being sold.
The original vision of the Raspberry Pi was to promote amateur
programming and to re-invigorate the teaching of computing in the UK
(and elsewhere) by providing a very low-cost and easily hackable system.
Naturally, though, its open source code allows it to be applied in
many different situations. Here, for example, is a plan to create a secure chat system for activists that can be used in countries where communications are routinely under surveillance, using a program called Cryptocat:
On
Techdirt.
Amidst the growing enthusiasm for digital texts -- ebooks and scans
of illustrated books -- it's easy to overlook some important drawbacks.
First, that you don't really own ebooks, as various unhappy experiences
with Amazon's Kindle have brought home.
Secondly, that a scan of an illustrated book is only as good as the
scanning technology that is available when it is made: there's no way to
upgrade a scan to higher quality images without rescanning the whole
thing.
On
Techdirt.
Some bad ideas just keep on coming back, despite the fact that they
are manifestly stupid. Trying to get Google and others to pay for the
privilege of sending more traffic to newspapers by including short
snippets from their stories is one of them. Of course, logic would
dictate that the newspapers should be paying Google for the marketing it
provides, but unfortunately not everyone sees it that way.
On
Techdirt.
As Techdirt reported
earlier this year, Spain's Sinde Law, designed to combat file sharing
by blocking sites with allegedly infringing material, has an extremely
complex history. It finally went into effect on 1 March, and was
immediately met with a clever denial of service attack from a Spanish group with the self-explanatory name "Hackivistas". As TorrentFreak explains:
On
Techdirt.
One of the most insidious aspects of recent Internet policy-making is
that much of it is taking place behind closed doors, with little or no
consultation -- think of SOPA, PIPA, ACTA and TPP. But there's another
dangerous trend: the rise of "informal" agreements between the copyright
industries and Internet service providers.
On
Techdirt.
Even though the European Commission has referred
ACTA to the European Court of Justice, the European Parliament
continues to examine the treaty in its various committees. Earlier this
week, the one dealing with International Trade
met for a preliminary discussion. One of the key speakers was the
Commissioner responsible for ACTA, Karel De Gucht, who naturally tried
to make light of the many problems that have been raised in recent
weeks.
On
Techdirt.
Here's an interesting move from the European Commission:
On
Open Enterprise blog.
One of the striking features of the demonstrations
against ACTA that took place across Europe over the last few weeks was
the youth of the participants. That's not to say that only young
people are concerned about ACTA, but it's an indication that they take
its assault on the Internet very personally -- unlike, perhaps, older
and more dispassionate critics.
On
Techdirt.
Just as the original term of copyright has been constantly extended
from the original 14 years in the Statute of Anne, so the the scope of
intellectual monopolies has been widened by the introduction of new ways
in which people assert ownership of abstractions. Here's the latest
idea: a right to protect your image.
On
Techdirt.
A couple of weeks ago, Techdirt wrote
about a surprising initiative by the Netherlands to introduce new
flexibilities into its copyright law. Given that leadership from the
Dutch government, it's probably no surprise that a few days later, the
Dutch Parliament also showed itself in the political vanguard by voting not to ratify ACTA for the time being.
On
Techdirt.
A couple of weeks ago, Techdirt reported
on UK politicians calling for ISPs to "take down" terrorist content.
Now it seems that the idea has not only spread to other European
countries, but even acquired a cheesy name: "the Clean IT Project".
On
Techdirt.
January 18, 2012 may well go down as a pivotal date in the
history of the Internet – and of copyright. For on that day, the
English-language Wikipedia and thousands of other websites were blacked
out or modified to protest against two bills passing through the US
legislative system that were designed to fight copyright infringement.
To understand why that unprecedented action took place, and what it
means for the future of the Net, it’s necessary to review the history of
copyright briefly.
On Stir to Action.
Somewhat belatedly (apologies), here is the second part of my
analysis of the UK government's Open Standards consultation. As well as
a quick look at the remaining two chapters, I include my responses to
individual questions at the end.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
A few months ago, I wrote
about the library management program Koha, and how the irruption of
money into the previously tranquil world of open source led to some
painful arguments. Sadly, that's not a unique example, as the recent
case of WURFL demonstrates.
On
The H Open.
As Techdirt reported
at the time, the UK's Digital Economy Bill was rammed through
Parliament, without proper scrutiny or even much democratic process, in
the dying hours of the previous government. Since then, the
implementation of the Digital Economy Act has moved forward relatively
slowly. That's partly because there have been a series of legal challenges
from ISPs concerned about its legality (and likely cost for them). In
addition, it made sense for the current UK government to wait for the
completion of the Hargreaves report on copyright in the digital age
before proceeding.
On
Techdirt.
A couple of weeks ago the popular ebook portal Library.nu was shut down,
apparently voluntarily, after a coalition of book publishers obtained
an injunction against it and a similar site. As an excellent post on the
kNOw Future Inc. blog points out, Library.nu was significant in a number of ways:
On
Techdirt.
The governmental body that oversees France's "three-strikes" law, HADOPI, has already been caught once infringing
on the copyright of others -- by using a logo designed with unlicensed
fonts. Now it's been spotted using photographs without respecting the
so-called "moral rights" of the photographer, which include the right to attribution (French original),
absent on HADOPI's site. Such moral rights are taken very seriously in
France, where they are automatic, perpetual and cannot be waived
(unlike in some other jurisdictions, such as the United Kingdom.)
On
Techdirt.