skip to main |
skip to sidebar
I've been writing about the attempt to craft a Unitary Patent in
Europe for some years. The idea in itself is not bad: a patent that is
valid across all of Europe. That would simplify filings and save costs,
both of which are to be welcomed. But the devil is in the details, and
it looks like those details are increasingly devilish.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
A couple of months back, Mike wrote about how Psy's relaxed attitude to people infringing
on his copyright helped turn Gangnam Style into one of the most
successful cultural phenomena in recent years, and that includes
becoming the most-viewed video on YouTube ever
Ah yes, the maximalists will retort, this free-and-easy, laid-back
approach is all very nice, but it doesn't put food on his table, does
it? If you want to make a living from this stuff, you've got to enforce copyright to stop all those freeloaders ruining your business. Well, maybe not:
On
Techdirt.
France's Hadopi graduated response approach, also known as "three
strikes", occupies a special place in the annals of copyright
enforcement. It pioneered the idea of punishing users accused of
sharing unauthorized copies of files, largely thanks to pressure from
the previous French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, who seems to have hated
most aspects of this new-fangled Internet thing. Sadly, other
countries took up the idea, including the UK with its awful Digital
Economy Act, New Zealand, Spain and, more recently, the US.
On
Techdirt.
One of the more extraordinary transformations in the last couple of
decades has been copyright's evolution from a rather dry and dusty
subject of interest only to a specialised class of lawyers to something
that affects everyone every second of their lives online. Indeed,
copyright is now arguably among the most important laws around today,
and is having a major impact on a wide range of issues - the defeat of ACTA, nominally a treaty about trade, is perhaps the most dramatic example of this.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
It's fairly widely accepted that the key digital device in the future
will be the mobile phone, not the desktop computer that has had such an
impact on Western society for the last few decades. That's partly a
question of cost -- if devices are to reach even the poorest in emerging
economies, they must be very cheap. But there are also other factors,
such as the mobile phone's small size and portability; its rugged design
and ability to cope with intermittent power supplies; and the built-in
Net connectivity that more or less comes as standard.
On
Techdirt.
Techdirt has run a number of articles about the ITU's World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT)
currently taking place in Dubai. One of the concerns is that decisions
taken there may make the Internet less a medium that can be used to
enhance personal freedom than a tool for state surveillance and
oppression.
On
Techdirt.
Last week Techdirt wrote about the perverse
attitude of the UK recording industry, which seems obsessed with
"stamping out piracy" rather than making more money. Here's a story
from TorrentFreak that looks to be another example of attacking first and thinking afterwards:
On
Techdirt.
Anyone who has been reading this blog for a while will be well aware
of some of the key problems with copyright in the Internet age. For
example, the desire to stop people sharing unauthorised digital files
online has led to more and more extreme legislation, culminating in the
recent ACTA and TPP.
In fact, it is impossible to stop people sharing such files unless you
institute total surveillance to check on everything that is uploaded and
downloaded. By an interesting coincidence, that is precisely where we
are heading thanks to legislation like the Draft Communications Data Bill...
On
Open Enterprise blog.
A couple of months ago, Ben Zevenbergen explained
how the Dutch Supreme Court was finding it difficult to reconcile
different aspects of Europe's copyright rules. At the heart of the
problem is the copyright levy system, effectively a tax on blank media
that is supposed to compensate copyright holders for a supposed "loss"
from copies made for personal use.
On
Techdirt.
For a while, Techdirt has been tracking Iran's continuing efforts to
throttle its citizens' access to troublesome materials online. These
have included blocking all audio and video files, and even shutting down Gmail, albeit temporarily.
But stopping people accessing sites in this way is not the only approach. Here's another, from a report by Der Spiegel (original in German):
On
Techdirt.
A natural response to the increasingly harsh enforcement of laws
against unauthorized sharing of copyright files is to move to encrypted
connections. It seems like a perfect solution: nobody can eavesdrop,
and so nobody can find out what you are sharing. But as TorrentFreak
reports, a German court has just dealt a blow to this approach.
On
Techdirt.
Techdirt wrote about how the UK's Twitter Joke conviction dragged its slow way through the various appeals before finally being resolved with the defendant's acquittal.
As you will recall, the issue was somebody making an ill-advised joke
about blowing up an airport if he couldn't fly out of it:
On
Techdirt.
As I noted
at the time, perhaps the most revolutionary aspect of the Hargreaves
Review of copyright in the digital age was simply the idea that
copyright policy should be based on evidence. Of course, the fact that
until now it has been determined purely by dogma, and drawing on bogus
statistics put out by the copyright industries, is incredibly damning.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
The evolution of the V for Vendetta Guy Fawkes mask from a clever element in a comic book and film to a meme and a global symbol of online and offline resistance has been quite remarkable. A highlight of that trend was earlier this year when MPs in the Polish parliament donned the masks in protest against ACTA, spurred on by massive street demonstrations against the treaty that had recently been held across Poland.
On
Techdirt.
Recently I've written about several moves towards mandating openness in various ways - in the UK,
Spain and Portugal. That's all well and good, but what people want to
know is whether moving to open solutions brings benefits - in
particular, whether it saves money. Fortunately, we have a long-running
experiment being carried out by the city of Munich that provides us
with some hard data.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
One of the biggest problems with the current approach to dealing with
alleged copyright infringement is the totally disproportionate nature
of the action undertaken in response to it. The "three strikes"
collective punishment of households that is available in France, New Zealand and South Korea is one example of this. From Finland, we learn about another completely over-the-top action:
On
Techdirt.
A couple of weeks ago, I was reviewing
Spain's move to open standards. The good news is that elsewhere on the
Iberian peninsular, Portugal, too, is doing great work in this area.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
It seems extraordinary that in the area of copyright it is only
recently that people have started to consider the evidence before
formulating policy. Even now, there is still resistance
to this idea in some quarters. Elsewhere, though, there is a growing
recognition that policy-makers must have access to the data they need
when considering how to achieve given goals.
On
Techdirt.
Yesterday I was writing about open access and open data in the context of the EU's
Horizon 2020 initiative. Closer to home, I came across a wonderful
real-life example of how open data can almost certainly save not just
money, but lives.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
In retrospect, it is now clear that the pivotal moment in the
campaign against ACTA was last January, when thousands of people took to
the streets in Poland
despite the sub-zero temperatures there. A few weeks later, similar
protests took place across the continent, especially in Eastern Europe,
which then influenced politicians at all levels, culminating in the rejection of ACTA by the European Parliament on July 4.
On
Techdirt.