skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Even against a background of repeated attempts to censor the Net,
it's still possible to become a little complacent about some of the
actions being taken by the copyright industries. For example, many
people probably feel that blocking a site like The Pirate Bay isn't
really a problem because, after all, it's just one site, right?
On
Techdirt.
As we know, the Internet works by breaking digital information up
into IP packets which are then routed independently over the network,
and then re-assembled at their destination. Anything made up of 0s and
1s can be sent anywhere with an Internet connection in this way, but
that isn't much good for physical objects.
On
Techdirt.
Daft trademarking stories are common enough, but it's always fun to come across new variations on the theme. Netzpolitik points us to this story from Denmark, where a Spanish-owned property site called HomelifeSpain.com ran into trouble because the word "home" was trademarked in Denmark by the Danish property site home.dk.
This resulted in the rather incredible remedy of the website itself
being banned entirely. As Netzpolitik notes, this is classic function
creep: such web blocks were introduced to fight -- you guessed it --
child pornography, and yet here they are being applied in the rather
less serious matter of trademark infringement.
On
Techdirt.
It's not often that trade agreements make it to the front page of the newspapers, but that's what happened on New Year's Day:
On
Open Enterprise blog.
As we reported a few months back, Keir Starmer, the UK's Director of Public Prosecutions, made the remarkable suggestion
that "the time has come for an informed debate about the boundaries of
free speech in an age of social media." That debate has now arrived in
the form of a UK consultation on "prosecutions involving social media
communications," which takes as its starting point a series of interim
guidelines for UK prosecutors when they are grappling with the freedom
of speech issues raised by such cases. Here's how Starmer describes the initiative:
On
Techdirt.
One of the most depressing developments in recent years has been the
gradual adoption of legal approaches to tackling copyright infringement
that a few years ago would have been regarded as totally unacceptable,
and the hallmarks of a tinpot republic run by some ridiculous dictator.
Here's another example, this time from Israel, involving secret courts and inscrutable judgments, as Jonathan Klinger explains:
On
Techdirt.
If ACTA was the biggest global story of
2012, more locally there's no doubt that the UK government's
consultation on open standards was the key event. As readers will
remember, this was the final stage in a long-running saga with many
twists and turns, mostly brought about by some uncricket-like behaviour
by proprietary software companies who dread a truly level playing-field
for government software procurement.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
One of the striking -- and depressing -- features of the Internet
today is the almost universal desire of governments around the world to
rein it in through new laws. We wrote about one such attempt in the
Philippines a couple of months ago, where the government is trying to
bring in some particularly wide-ranging and troubling legislation.
Although the Philippine Supreme Court put a temporary restraining order on the law, the Philippine government is not softening its stance, and has asked the court to lift the order. Its arguments are pretty worrying:
On
Techdirt.
Despite increasing competition around the world, China remains the
leader when it comes to finding ways to censor the online world. A few
months ago, the site Tech in Asia listed no less than eight ways in
which users of Sina Weibo, China's hugely-popular homegrown microblog
service, can be penalized for "inappropriate" tweets. Now it seems it has come up with a ninth:
On
Techdirt.
Techdirt has been covering the UK's long-running saga of attempted copyright reform for some years. Most recently, we wondered
whether even the Hargreaves Review's moderate suggestions would survive
in the face of the usual frenzied lobbying from the copyright industry.
Rather remarkably, they have, and the UK government has published a
list of the legislative changes it proposes to make (pdf).
On
Techdirt.
Alongside globe-spanning treaties like ACTA and TPP, there are more
subtle efforts to limit the power of national governments, through the
use of free trade agreements (FTAs) and bilateral investment treaties
(BITs). There are now so many of these that it's hard to keep up,
although the dedicated site bilaterals.org is a great help
here. The confusing multiplicity only adds to their attractiveness for
those negotiating them behind close doors, keen as they are to avoid
transparency as much as possible.
On
Techdirt.
As Techdirt readers well know, one of the problems with measures
brought in for "exceptional situations" -- be it fighting terrorism or
tackling child pornography -- is that once in place, they have a habit
of being applied more generally. A case in point is the blocking of
Newzbin2 by BT in the UK. That was possible because BT had already
installed its "Cleanfeed" system to block child pornography: once in
place, this "specialized" censorship system could easily be deployed to block quite different sites.
On
Techdirt.
As readers of this blog well know, copyright reform has been
desperately needed in this country for many years. The earlier Gowers
Review was almost totally ignored by the government that commissioned
it, and there was always the fear that the more recent Hargreaves Review
might suffer the same fate. Miraculously, that seems not to be the
case. Just before Christmas, the UK government published its response
to the consultation on copyright exceptions and clarifying copyright law
with details of how it intends to proceed (.pdf), and they are really pretty good.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
Last week I wrote a potted history of the defeat of ACTA in
the last year. I mentioned that in the original talk, whose slides I
embedded in the article, I concluded by trying to draw some wider
lessons about fighting attacks on the Internet and broader freedoms.
Here's a summary of what I said.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
Back in 2010, Techdirt reported on Turkey's habit of blocking Google
over certain holdings on its various sites. Mostly these were YouTube
videos it took exception to, but other services were banned too.
An earlier case, from 2009, received less attention at the time, but
has now led to a precedent-setting ruling from the European Court of
Human Rights (ECHR) that could have a big impact on future cases in
Europe, and maybe even beyond.
On
Techdirt.
Rather out of the blue, Business Secretary Vince Cable has made a series of proposals affecting patents, copyright and trade marks:
On
Open Enterprise blog.
The European Commission has announced that it is withdrawing its referral of ACTA to
the European Court of Justice. If you had forgotten about that
particular detail, you're probably not alone: so much happened with ACTA in such a short space of time during the last year, that it's easy to lose track.
On
Open Enterprise blog.