skip to main  |
      skip to sidebar
          
        
          
        
          
        
In yesterday's post
 about Microsoft's lobbying of the Cabinet Office against truly open 
standards based on RF licensing, I spent some time examining the first 
part of a letter sent by the company on 20 May last year.  The second 
part concentrates on the issue of open standards for document exchange. 
 This touches on one of the most brutal episodes in recent computing 
history - the submission of Microsoft's OOXML file format to ISO for approval. 
On 
Open Enterprise blog.
 
 
 
As Techdirt reported
 a couple of years ago, a hard-fought campaign in New Zealand to prevent
 software patents being granted there seemed to have paid off, with a Patents Bill explicitly excluding them that came with the following commentary: 
On 
Techdirt.
 
 
 
In my last post, I wrote
 about my Freedom of Information request to find out how Microsoft had 
been lobbying against true open standards that mandated RF licensing.  
In fact, I made another at the same time, asking a similar question 
about the Business Software Alliance's contacts with the Cabinet Office.
  There turned out to be only two meetings, and one email, so clearly 
the BSA played less of a role than Microsoft in this area.
On 
Open Enterprise blog.
 
 
 
Last week, the EU Rapporteur on ACTA, David Martin, announced he would recommend that the European Parliament reject the treaty.  He has now made good on that promise in his report, available in draft form (pdf): 
On 
Techdirt.
 
 
 
Light Blue Touchpaper is a blog written by researchers in the 
Security Group at the University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory (don't
 miss the explanation
 of the blog's rather witty name). It's normally full of deep stuff 
about computer security and vulnerabilities, and is well worth reading 
for that reason.
On 
The H Open.
 
 
 
Regular readers may recall that I was not a little taken aback by an astonishing U-turn performed by the Cabinet Office on the matter of open standards.  As I pointed out in a follow-up article, this seemed to bear the hallmarks of a Microsoft intervention, but I didn't have any proof of that. 
On 
Open Enterprise blog.
 
 
 
Last week we saw the Socialists and Democrats, the second-largest bloc in the European Parliament, turn against
 ACTA.  Combined with the stated position of the Green party there, that
 means ACTA is closer to being thrown out when the vote for ratification
 takes place in Brussels this summer. 
On 
Techdirt.
 
 
 
Here's an interesting development in the legal battle between Microsoft and Motorola in Germany that we discussed recently.  It seems that Microsoft is worried that the German court might award Motorola an injunction against it, and so has asked a US judge to stop Motorola from using it in that case -- and he agreed: 
On 
Techdirt.
 
 
 
As we recently reported,
 ACTA has been dealt a serious blow by the EU Rapporteur's 
recommendation that the European Parliament should reject the treaty.  
In a fascinating leaked document (pdf) obtained by EDRI, it seems that even the G8 countries have accepted that ACTA is probably dead -- and have started working on a successor. 
On 
Techdirt.
 
 
 
As a way of fighting unauthorized sharing of digital files, DRM is 
particularly stupid.  It not only doesn't work -- DRM is always broken, 
and DRM-less versions quickly produced -- it also makes the official 
versions less valuable than the pirated ones, since they are less 
convenient to use in multiple ways.  As a result, DRM actually makes 
piracy more attractive, which is probably why most of the music industry
 eventually decided to drop it. 
On 
Techdirt.
 
 
 
Something that's proving popular with politicians running out of 
ideas for tackling unauthorized sharing of copyright materials online is
 to make ISPs and Web sites responsible for the actions of their users 
-- even though nobody would think of doing the same for telephone 
companies.  SOPA was one of the best-known examples of this approach, 
and now it looks like Russia wants to join the club: 
On 
Techdirt.
 
 
 
At the end of a morning of discussions about ACTA organized by the Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament, the Rapporteur for ACTA, David Martin, has recommended that the European Parliament should reject the treaty, saying: 
On 
Techdirt.
 
 
 
What an extraordinary ride ACTA is proving.
When I first started this series of ACTA 
Updates back in February, I didn't hold out much hope that we would be 
able to stop it simply grinding through the European approval process.  
But over the last two months I've detailed some amazing events that have
 had a huge impact on ACTA's chances of being ratified.  And yesterday, those amazing events culminated in the following statement from the European Parliament's rapporteur for ACTA:
On 
Open Enterprise blog.
 
 
 
Just as companies often try to file their patent lawsuits in East Texas, so Germany is emerging as a favorite forum for patent litigation in Europe -- and for precisely the same reason: 
On 
Techdirt.
 
 
 
            
        
          
        
          
        
The Boycott Elsevier
 movement discussed here on Techdirt several times was born of a 
frustration at the high prices of academic journals.  But another area 
arguably afflicted even more is that of textbooks for higher education: 
On 
Techdirt.
 
 
 
Earlier this week I wrote
 about the first company based on open source to reach a turnover of one
 billion dollars.  But of course, there are lots of multi-billion dollar
 turnover companies that are based on open source - Google, Facebook, 
Twitter etc. - it's just that they don't make money off it directly.
On 
Open Enterprise blog.
 
 
 
One of the central problems of ACTA has been its lack of transparency.
  TPP has also been negotiated behind closed doors, but unlike ACTA has 
permitted at least one small opportunity for public groups to engage 
with the negotiators through the use of stakeholder forums,
 where organizations and even individuals were permitted to give short 
presentations about aspects of TPP.  This has allowed points of view 
other than those of industry lobbyists to be heard by negotiators. 
On 
Techdirt.
 
 
 
I still remember well the day in October 1994 when I downloaded the 
first beta of Netscape's browser.  It was instantly obvious that this 
was a step beyond anything we'd had until then, and that it was the dawn
 of a new Internet era.
On 
Open Enterprise blog.
 
 
 
One of the favorite tropes of the anti-piracy crowd is that all this 
unauthorized sharing is killing culture, pauperizing artists and 
generally making the world go to hell in a handbasket.  The only pieces 
of evidence adduced in support of that position are the market reports 
put together for the copyright industries that (a) say the sky is 
falling and (b) base that analysis on the industries' own unsubstantiated claims. 
On 
Techdirt.
 
 
 
Recently, there was some justified excitement that Red Hat had finally done it, and turned in annual sales of over $1 billion.  A couple of years ago, I wrote
 a post here on Computerworld UK wondering why there were no companies 
based around open source that had managed to achieve such billion-dollar
 turnovers, and suggested that the key reason was one put forward by Red
 Hat's CEO, Jim Whitehurst:
On 
Open Enterprise blog.
 
 
 
Rick Falkvinge has another of his fascinating posts up on his Web 
site, but this one's slightly different from his usual insights into the
 dysfunctional nature of copyright and patents.  It concerns some 
little-known (to me, at least) history of how Sweden went from being a beacon of freedom to a country under comprehensive surveillance. 
On 
Techdirt.
 
 
 
            
        
          
        
          
        
ACTA and TPP have much in common.  That's no coincidence, since they 
are both born of a common desire to move away from multilateral forums 
like WIPO that are relatively open to scrutiny, to invitation-only 
groups negotiating behind closed doors.  That lack of transparency has 
allowed all kinds of extreme measures to be proposed without any 
countervailing arguments being heard about why they are neither fair nor
 sensible. 
On 
Techdirt.