skip to main |
skip to sidebar
An increasing number of Open Enterprise posts are about moves to open
up government in myriad ways. That's not really surprising, since open
source clearly is a perfect match for public administrations, as are
open standards, and open data is a natural outgrowth of software
openness.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
There's plenty of breathless writing about the imminent 3D-printing
revolution, but realistically, what is it likely to mean for most
people? They probably won't all be printing out their own planes, but they may well be printing out small replacement parts for goods they own. Here's an early example of that from the world of electronics, spotted by the Shapeways site:
On
Techdirt.
As I've noted a couple of times,
one of the key issues that has yet to be resolved concerning the
proposed EU Unitary Patent system is which court will have the final
say. Will it be the European Court of Justice (ECJ), or the main
Unitary Patent Court? Or, put another way, will Articles 6 to 8 of the
Unitary Patent Regulation to be adopted by the Council and the European
Parliament be deleted or not? If they are removed, ultimate power rests
with the Unitary Patent Court; if they remain, the ECJ has the last word.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
Levies on blank storage media are a relic of older times when copying
was a new possibility for copyright works. You no longer needed an LP
pressing plant, say, you could copy music in the comfort of your own
home, first on analog cassette tapes, then later on digital media like
CDs and MP3 players. At that time, it was easy to see each of those
copies as somehow replacing purchases, and so the argument for levies
was born: people should pay indirectly for the "lost" sales their
copying caused.
On
Techdirt.
Last week, I mentioned
that I attended the Open Forum Europe 2012 conference. Preceeding it
was the first meeting of the Open Forum Academy (OFA), of which I am a
member. Here's how it describes itself:
On
Open Enterprise blog.
If you cast your mind back to the heady days of summer, when we were all worried about what ACTA might do, one of the problems was with Article 27, whose third paragraph reads:
On
Open Enterprise blog.
Techdirt writes a lot about the problems with DRM, and how
inefficient and inconvenient it is. But for millions of
visually-impaired people, those "inconveniences" represent something
much deeper, and much worse. Somebody who has started writing
eloquently about this issue is Rupert Goodwins. He is one of the UK's
most respected technology journalists and also, sadly, is losing his
sight. As he points out in a powerful new piece, things ought to be getting better for the visually impaired in the Internet age:
On
Techdirt.
Any EU project called "Clean IT",
with all that implies for elements that are regarded as "dirty", is
worrying enough. But combined with a stated intention of "reducing the
impact of the terrorist use of the Internet", the concerns naturally
grow. After all, it is precisely by invoking the vague and emotional
threat of "terrorism" that the UK government has sought to short-circuit
criticism of many of its most illiberal policies, most recently with
the ill thought-out Draft Communications Bill.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
Just when you think the Megaupload farce can't get any more ridiculous, it does. Following revelations
that New Zealand's Government Communications Security Bureau illegally
intercepted communications in the Megaupload case and provided those
details to law enforcement authorities, the country's Prime Minister has
been forced to apologize personally to Kim Dotcom:
"Of course I apologize to Mr Dotcom, and I apologize to New
Zealanders." From his position of increasing strength as more and more
missteps by the New Zealand authorities come to light, Dotcom graciously accepted those apologies.
On
Techdirt.
Remember back in 2009, when Techdirt reported
that Rupert Murdoch hated Google so much he had decided to block the
search engine from indexing his titles, even though this would
inevitably cut down their visibility and online traffic? He obviously
thought that he would put this upstart technology in its place, showing
that mighty media moguls don't need this Internet thing in order to
flourish just like they did 50 years ago. According to this story in
paidContent, it seems that strategy hasn't worked out too well:
On
Techdirt.
Neelie Kroes is not your average European Commissioner. Before she
became the European Commissioner for Digital Agenda, her current post,
she was European Commissioner for Competition, and in that capacity made
a speech about open standards in 2008, which included the following statements:
On
Open Enterprise blog.
As Tim Cushing rightly noted earlier this week, the UK's "Free Speech" laws are more about the many things you can't say. As if to back up that view, in the last few days, there's been yet another case of somebody being arrested there for "an offensive Facebook page."
On
Techdirt.
A recent scandal in the UK concerned the country's worst sporting
disaster, when 96 football/soccer fans were crushed to death at a
stadium in Hillsborough in 1989. Prime Minister David Cameron issued an official apology to the families of the victims
for the fact that the safety measures at the ground were known to be
inadequate, and that police and emergency services had tried to deflect
the blame for the disaster onto fans.
On
Techdirt.
Large-scale surveillance of private communications is becoming depressingly routine, even in supposedly enlightened democracies. In less freedom-loving locations, Internet cafes are viewed with particular suspicion, and subject to tight controls. But it looks like Cambodia is taking surveillance of Internet cafes in particular, and communications in general, to new heights/depths:
On
Techdirt.
The debate is still raging whether Bitcoin is a brilliant idea that will revolutionize business and society, a high-tech money laundering scheme, or just a fad that will soon pass into history. But in a fascinating post, Jon Matonis points to a problem that doesn't really seem to have been considered before:
On
Techdirt.
Back in February we wrote
about the ominously-named "Clean IT" project in Europe, designed to
combat the use of the Internet by terrorists. At that time, we
suspected that this would produce some seriously bad ideas, but a leaked document obtained by EDRI shows that these are actually much worse than feared
(pdf), amounting to a system of continuous surveillance, extrajudicial
removal of content and some new proposals that can only be described as
deranged.
On
Techdirt.
As Techdirt observed
back in 2007, Brazilian artists were some of the first to recognize
that piracy can be a positive force that helps get the word out about
their creations. That was part of a larger openness to new ideas about
copyright that was symbolized by the appointment of the well-known
Brazilian musician Gilberto Gil
as Minister of Culture, a post he held from 2003 until 2008. However,
more recently, things have gone into reverse on the copyright front.
Ana de Hollanda, the Minister of Culture appointed by the current
President, ordered the CC license to be removed from the Ministry of
Culture's website, and there were indications that harsher copyright laws were coming.
On
Techdirt.
One of the depressing things about net neutrality is that it is a
battle that must be won again and again. It's becoming increasingly
clear that another effort will be made by telecoms companies to destroy
net neutrality at the big World Conference on International
Telecommunications (WCIT). Here's how it describes itself:
On
Open Enterprise blog.
Remember that sweet octogenarian lady in Spain who tried to restore a 19th-century fresco
"Ecce Homo" and ended up producing something that the BBC's Europe
correspondent described as "a crayon sketch of a very hairy monkey in an
ill-fitting tunic"? Remember how the poor woman had an anxiety attack as a result of the criticism she received, but that everything worked out fine when her work became an Internet meme, and sightseers started flocking to see it?
On
Techdirt.
Techdirt has had many posts pointing out that the huge and vibrant fashion industry is a perfect demonstration that you don't need monopolies to succeed, and that bringing in copyright for clothes and accessories now would be positively harmful. One of the people who's been making that point for years is Kal Raustiala (co-author of this month's Techdirt book club choice, The Knockoff Economy). NPR Books has just posted a short interview with him that succinctly explains why copyright would be a disaster for the fashion industry. Here are a couple of the key points.
On
Techdirt.
Techdirt has written about earlier moves
by India to block Web sites and censor Twitter accounts. The central
concern seems to be that inflammatory online activity might stoke or
provoke local outbreaks of violence of the kind seen recently in Assam. Now The Times of India is reporting that the Indian government wants to go further, and actively monitor who's saying what by setting up a new agency:
On
Techdirt.
Julia Schramm is one of the rising stars of the German Pirate Party:
in April, when she was just 27 years old, she was elected to the
national party's executive committee. No surprise, then, that she is
against copyright: in a podcast she described intellectual property as
"disgusting" (original in German.)
More surprising is that, despite this, she signed a contract with
Knaus-Verlag, part of the publishing giant Random House group, to write a
book. Perhaps the $130,000 advance had something to do with it.
On
Techdirt.