skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Techdirt has been following the fascinating saga of Iceland's crowdsourced constitution for nearly two years. Back in October 2012, we noted that Icelandic citizens gave it a pretty big thumbs up. Reflecting that, it really looked like Iceland's parliament might pass the associated bill, and go down in the history books for this bold re-invention of itself.
Even if you don't remember the birth of Mozilla 15 years ago, you are certainly benefitting from its consequences. For, back then, the company that invented the Web as a mass medium, Netscape, was in its death throes, and looked likely to take Web browser choice with it.
Following my post yesterday about the extraordinary failure of the IPRED consultation process, I enclose below my letter sent to the European Commission on the subject, calling for an extension to the consultation, and for alternative ways of making submissions:
After weathering earlier attacks on its reliability, Wikipedia is now an essential feature of our online and cultural landscapes. Indeed, it's hard now to imagine a world where you can't quickly check up some fact or other by going online to Wikipedia and typing in a few keywords. But that centrality brings with it its own problems, as a post from Benjamin Mako Hill about legal threats he received thanks to his work as a Wikipedia editor makes clear.
Last week I made a couple of urgent pleas to readers to complete the major EU IPRED consultation, which was being conducted on the Web. Since I needed to be able to refer to my own answers, I saved these as a draft online so that I could go back to them, polish them, and then submit them.
Last year, Techdirt wrote about an interesting article suggesting that we should welcome "cyberwar" since it would be so much less painful than the ordinary kind. Of course, that begs the question what we actually mean by "cyberwar", since some forms are probably less humane than others. As we have pointed out, the use of the totally embarrassing "cyber" prefix is really just an excuse for more government controls and for security companies to get fat contracts implementing them.
As Mike noted a couple of days ago, international trade agreements often have the effect of constraining
the power of national legislatures. Indeed, that's doubtless one of
the reasons why they have become so popular in recent years: they allow
backroom deals between politicians and lobbyists to set the agenda for
law-making around the world, without the need for any of that pesky
democratic oversight nonsense. In particular, the trade agreement
between South Korea and the US is turning out to be a key limiting factor for both TPP and what US politicians might try to do about phone unlocking. This makes two recent moves to loosen South Korea's harsh copyright laws potentially important far beyond that country's borders.
On
Techdirt.
Yesterday I mentioned the important consultation on IPRED, how
it was closing soon, and what a good idea it would be if you applied to
take part immediately. I also noted there's a helpful guide to filling
in the consultation, from EDRI, but I omitted to mention that there is an equally great one from the Pirate Party MEP Amelia Andersdotter, which I thoroughly recommend.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
Today is Document Freedom Day:
It is a day for celebrating and raising awareness of Open
Standards and formats which takes place on the last Wednesday in March
each year. On this day people who believe in fair access to
communications technology teach, perform, and demonstrate.
On
Open Enterprise blog.
IPRED is not that well known, even among
the Net-savvy. And yet it's one of the most important EU directives
that affects the online world, and a consultation on its future closes
at the end of this week, on 30 March. Here's the background from EDRI:
On
Open Enterprise blog.
Hackers and hacking have been much in the news recently - for all the
wrong reasons, unfortunately. The most dramatic case, perhaps, was the
suicide of Aaron Swartz. He was threatened with 35 years in prison, partly for this:
On
Open Enterprise blog.
Techdirt has been following the rapid rise and current problems
of the various Pirate Parties in Europe for some time. Both their
success and difficulties flow in part from the fact that they do not fit
neatly into the traditional political categories. This makes them
attractive to those who are disenchanted with established parties, but
also makes it hard for Pirate Parties to devise a coherent political
program that they can seek to implement, for example through alliances
with others.
On
Techdirt.
As you may have heard, there's been an election in Rome
recently. These kind of events tend to bring out the crowds, and NBC
had the clever idea of finding a couple of pictures showing roughly the same view, but eight years apart.
They look very similar, except for one rather striking detail: in the
first, from 2005, there are a few mobile phones visible; in the second,
taken recently, tiny screens are visible everywhere in the crowd -- it
seems as if practically everyone is using their phone to take a picture.
On
Techdirt.
It would be something of an understatement to say that people have
strong opinions about patents. But as Techdirt has reported, there's a
growing consensus that software patents in particular aren't working -- James Bessen and Michael J. Meurer have written an entire book, "Patent Failure", about how bad things are there, and why it's happening in this area rather than elsewhere.
On
Techdirt.
Although the use of open source by the UK government has an unhappy
history (and one that certainly isn't finished), one ray of hope comes
from Gov.uk, as I've noted before. The driving force behind that site is the Government Digital Service
(GDS), and on its blog there's a particularly interesting post by Mike
Bracken, who rejoices in the splendid title of "Executive Director of
Digital in the Cabinet Office."
On
Open Enterprise blog.
Regular readers of this column will know that I am not overly
enamoured of the European Patent Office, since it has effectively
introduced software patents by the back door, in direct contravention of the will of the European Parliament. No surprise, then, that the EPO's Annual Report has plenty to worry about. For example, in his foreword, the EPO's President writes:
On
Open Enterprise blog.
In 2001, I published a history of free software, called "Rebel Code:
Inside Linux and the Open Source Revolution." One of the people I
interviewed for the book was Eben Moglen,
for many years the General Counsel for the Free Software Foundation,
and one of the main architects of the later versions of the GNU General
Public License. He had the following interesting thoughts on the
delivery of digital media:
On
Techdirt.
Two years ago, Techdirt wrote about the major report "Media Piracy in
Emerging Economies", which explored how media and software piracy in
emerging countries is largely a question of economics:
people and companies there simply cannot afford Western-style pricing,
and resort to alternative sourcing. That hasn't stopped media and
computer companies from demanding that governments around the world
should inflict ever-more harsh punishments on their own people.
On
Techdirt.
A couple of weeks ago I wrote
about how the irony-immune IT department of the European Parliament was
censoring emails complaining about censorship. Now it seems they have a
kindred spirit here in the UK:
On
Open Enterprise blog.
One of the slogans of the copyright industries is that you can't make
money from giving things away. Unfortunately for them, examples just
keep coming up showing that's simply not true. Techdirt wrote about the
interesting case of the London Evening Standard back in 2009, shortly
after its new owner decided to turn it from a (loss-making) paid-for
newspaper, into one that was given away. So, three years later, how did that work out?:
On
Techdirt.