skip to main  |
      skip to sidebar
          
        
          
        
Given the massive impact that new-style
 trade agreements like TPP and TAFTA/TTIP are likely to have on the 
lives of hundreds of millions of people, it's surprising how few members
 of the public know about what's being negotiated in their name.  
Fortunately, publications are starting to run more articles on the 
subject, like this great piece by David Brodwin in US News. 
On 
Techdirt. 
 
 
 
 
We last wrote about the Russian social network site VKontakte, often called "The Facebook of Russia," a year ago.  Since then, lots of bad stuff
 has been happening in Russia as a part of clampdown on online activity 
there, and now VKontakte is back in the news, with a pair of rather 
contradictory stories. 
On 
Techdirt. 
 
 
 
 
Last month, Techdirt wrote about the requirement for librarians employed by the Canadian government to self-censor
 their opinions, even in private.  This came in the wake of similar 
restrictions being placed on government scientists.  We pointed out that
 this kind of muzzling created a really bad precedent that might one day
 even be extended to the public.  It seems that moment has come sooner than expected: 
On 
Techdirt. 
 
 
 
 
Despite increasing calls for the imminent TAFTA/TTIP
 trade negotiations to be conducted as openly as possible, it seems 
likely that, as with ACTA and TPP, everything will be decided behind 
closed doors.  That means the rest of us are forced to take our 
information about what is likely to happen where we can find it. For 
example, a new survey entitled "The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: Ambitious but Achievable"
 (pdf), carried out by The Bertelsmann Foundation and Atlantic Council, 
offers some interesting thoughts on the subject.  Here's the 
description: 
On 
Techdirt. 
 
 
 
 
Techdirt has been covering the free trade agreement being negotiated 
between India and the EU for a while now -- that is, as well as anyone 
can report on something that is being conducted behind closed doors.
  Despite or maybe even because of that secrecy, one issue in particular
 has raised concerns: that India's crucial role as supplier of low-cost 
generics to the world's poor might be under threat. Against that background, this report on the Live Mint site comes as something of a surprise: 
On 
Techdirt. 
 
 
 
 
Traditionally, there has been a blithe assumption that more innovation 
occurs when patents are granted than when they are not.  But as Techdirt
 has reported, people are finally beginning to call that into question.
  A forthcoming paper from an economist at MIT, Heidi Williams, provides
 another example of where that is not the case: in the field of genomics
 (via @gsDetermination). 
On 
Techdirt. 
 
 
 
 
Techdirt has written a few times about Turkey's difficult
 relationship with new technology.  Unfortunately, it looks like that 
now includes Twitter, as two troubling decisions against users have been
 handed down recently.  Here's the first, as reported by the Turkish Web
 site Hürriyet Daily News: 
On 
Techdirt. 
 
 
 
 
The last time Techdirt wrote about "pay for delay"
 deals, whereby a big pharma company essentially buys off manufacturers 
of generics so that the former can continue to enjoy monopoly pricing 
long after its patents have expired, things didn't look too good.  Back 
in 2010, the Second Circuit had refused to re-hear a case on the issue 
after dismissing a lawsuit arguing these deals were anti-competitive.  
But now things seem very different, and not just in the US. 
On 
Techdirt.
 
 
 
 
Most companies have a natural tendency to keep details of their 
activities secret -- the fear being that competitors might be able to 
exploit for commercial advantage the information that they obtain.  But 
it may be in the public interest for some details to be released, even 
if this might prove inconvenient for the company concerned.  That's the 
background to a letter sent by ten law professors, including Larry 
Lessig, to the Alaska Oil & Gas Conservation Commission, pointed out to us by infojustice.org. 
On 
Techdirt. 
 
 
 
 
One of the many problems with the secretive nature of trade agreements 
is that it insulates negotiators from the real-world consequences of 
their actions.  That's particularly true for the FTA talks between the EU and India,
 currently taking place behind closed doors. One of the key issues for 
the EU side is India's role as a supplier of generic medicines to the 
world, and India's tough stance on issues like the evergreening
 of pharma patents.  From the various leaks that we have, it seems that 
the EU is demanding that India toe the line on drug patents, and cut 
back its supply of low-cost generics to emerging countries. 
On 
Techdirt. 
 
 
 
 
       
   
As regular readers of this column know, there's still a battle going on over whether standards should be FRAND or restriction/royalty-free (RF).  The folly of allowing standards to contain FRAND-licensed elements is shown most clearly by the current bickering
 between Microsoft and Google.  What makes that argument such a waste of
 time and money is the fact that for 20 years we have had the most stunning demonstration of the power of RF: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earlier this month I wrote a couple of posts about a letter I sent off to the European Commission concerning my appalling experience with the IPRED consultation.  Well, I now have a reply, which I reproduce below:
On 
Open Enterprise blog. 
 
 
 
 
Sorry to trouble you again this week, but there's an important vote in INTA today
 (25 April) on the transatlantic trade agreement (TAFTA/TTIP), and there
 are some crucial issues that you might like to convey to your MEP, especially if they are on the INTA committee. 
On 
Open Enterprise blog. 
 
 
 
 
It seems that the UK government will be deciding what to do about the Snooper's Charter
 this week.  It is already under huge pressure as more and more problems
 with the plans become evident.  I urge you to write to your MP (perhaps
 using WriteToThem.com) to express your own concerns.
On 
Open Enterprise blog. 
 
 
 
 
Back in February, I noted that the UK's investigation into making clinical trial data freely available was somewhat subsidiary to the EU's
 major initiative on the same subject.  The battle there between those 
who wish to keep clinical trials data secret, for fear that it might 
show pharma companies in a bad light, and those who believe that it must
 be released to save money and - more importantly - save lives is now 
increasingly fierce.
On 
Open Enterprise blog. 
 
 
 
 
As regular readers of this column will know, software patents have 
never really gone away, even though the European Patent Convention 
forbids them, and the European Parliament explicitly rejected them
 again in 2005.  Fans of intellectual monopolies just keep coming back 
with new ways of getting around those bans, which means that the battle 
to stop them crippling the European software industry has to be fought 
again and again.
On 
Open Enterprise blog. 
 
 
 
 
It seems hard to believe that it was only a little over a year ago that the threat from the US SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) was averted (and that ACTA was
 still with us in the EU).  But of course the war is never won: new 
threats to freedom and openness on the Internet just keep on coming. 
On 
Open Enterprise blog. 
 
 
 
 
Remember MySQL?  Most famous for being part of the LAMP stack,
 and thus powering the bulk of the innovative work done in the field of 
ecommerce for a decade or more, it's rather fallen off the radar 
recently.  It's not hard to see why: Oracle's acquisition of Sun, which 
had earlier bought MySQL for the not inconsiderable sum of $1 billion, 
meant that one of the key hacker projects was now run by the archetypal 
big-business mogul, Larry Ellison.  So it was natural that people were 
unsure about MySQL's future, and started looking for alternatives.
On 
Open Enterprise blog.