Licence to Thrill
As I've written elsewhere, licences are not peripheral to free software, they lie at its very heart. So argy-bargy over the new draft of GNU GPLv3 was bound to bring some interesting further developments, and that's what we have here:the strategy of the FSF is simple (I am paraphrasing here, nobody said these exact words to me):
1. FACT: we simply could not get GPLv3 out with the ASP provision or it would have been DOA. It is hard to disagree...
2. TRICK: we are creating another specific license that includes the ASP provision (AGPLv2) and we added in GPLv3 that the two will be compatible. The end result is license proliferation, but not license incompatibility which is the key issue.
3. GOAL: GET AGPL TO BE THE REAL NEXT GPL
2 comments:
Different philosophies warrant different licenses.
Certainly - that's why people have so much fun arguing about them.
Post a Comment