13 January 2007

Enclosing the Urban Commons

You don't usually think of cities as being a commons, but here's an interesting perspective that proposes precisely that:

Community development activists, urban planners, and city government officials are increasingly taking note of a disturbing trend: escalating housing costs are forcing lower-income and working- and middle-class residents to leave our nation’s cities. Gentrification and subsequent displacement are rampant. Across the country, millions of us can no longer afford to reside in our major urban areas.

...

Or, to put it in the vernacular of the commons, many of our most vibrant urban areas are being “enclosed.” Our cities which once were centers of diversity (ethnically, culturally, and in terms of income levels) are now becoming modern-day analogues to the medieval walled cities of Europe – available to the wealthy elite (and single, young, college-educated professionals with high levels of disposable incomes) while the people who make those cities function (service workers, teachers, police and firemen, city employees) must move to inner and outer-ring suburbs.

2 comments:

Bill Hooker said...

You don't usually think of cities as being a commons

Now that you've said that, it occurs to me that in a sense I do.

My views on community and my views on "openness" have (so to speak) co-evolved. I think a community, be it a village or a city, necessarily includes a physical commons (parks, etc), a cultural commons (libraries, theatres, etc), an ethical commons (indigent care, etc), an administrative commons (local government) and so on.

Wherever people's interests intersect, there is a commons, or at least the potential to create one. The more I think about these issues, the more convinced I am that an Open commons is usually the best way to manage such intersections. In fact, I rather think "community" in the best, standing-together, sense may really be another word for the equitable management of such intersections.

Glyn Moody said...

I agree - especially with the "the potential to create one" bit. The problem is, if people like you and me are only now starting to think and write about these things, it's going to take a while before everyone else agrees that it's "obvious"....